Skull Base Surgery of the Posterior Fossa

(avery) #1

142


existing cranial nerve deficits [ 22 ]. Lower cranial
nerve palsies are the most commonly observed
postoperative deficit, although these deficits
(unlike those present preoperatively) have a ten-
dency to recover with time [ 1 – 3 ]. Dysphagia with
an attendant risk of aspiration pneumonia may be
seen in up to 10% of patients. Multiple regression
analysis identified tumor recurrence, arachnoid
scarring, prevalent cranial extension, and absence
of preoperative lower CN dysfunction as signifi-
cantly associated with aspiration pneumonia
[ 18 ]. Vigilance is required postoperatively to
minimize these risks.


Conclusions

Foramen magnum meningiomas are a rare entity
with the potential for significant symptoms pre-
operatively and significant complications postop-
eratively. Thorough preoperative imaging and
evaluation aids in determining the extent of neu-
rovascular involvement and in detailing the bony
anatomy in the region of the tumor. With ade-
quate surgeon experience and selection of the
optimal surgical approach, successful extirpation
of the tumor may be achieved.


References


  1. Arnautovic KI, Al-Mefty O, Husain M. Ventral fora-
    men magnum meningiomas. J Neurosurg. 2000;92(1
    Suppl):71–80.

  2. Babu RP, Sekhar LN, Wright DC. Extreme lateral
    transcondylar approach: technical improvements
    and lessons learned. J Neurosurg. 1994;81(1):49–59.
    https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1994.81.1.0049.

  3. Bassiouni H, Ntoukas V, Asgari S, Sandalcioglu
    EI, Stolke D, Seifert V. Foramen magnum menin-
    giomas: clinical outcome after microsurgical resec-
    tion via a posterolateral suboccipital retrocondylar
    approach. Neurosurgery. 2006;59(6):1177–1185.;
    discussion 1185-1177. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.
    NEU.0000245629.77968.37.

  4. Beer-Furlan A, Vellutini EA, Balsalobre L, Stamm
    AC. Endoscopic endonasal approach to ventral
    posterior fossa meningiomas: from case selec-
    tion to surgical management. Neurosurg Clin N
    Am. 2015;26(3):413–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
    nec.2015.03.006.
    5. Bertalanffy H, Gilsbach JM, Mayfrank L, Klein HM,
    Kawase T, Seeger W. Microsurgical management of
    ventral and ventrolateral foramen magnum meningio-
    mas. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 1996;65:82–5.
    6. Borba LA, de Oliveira JG, Giudicissi-Filho M, Colli
    BO. Surgical management of foramen magnum menin-
    giomas. Neurosurg Rev. 2009;32(1):49–58.; discussion
    59–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-008-0161-5.
    7. Boulton MR, Cusimano MD. Foramen magnum
    meningiomas: concepts, classifications, and nuances.
    Neurosurg Focus. 2003;14(6):e10.
    8. Bruneau M, George B. Foramen magnum menin-
    giomas: detailed surgical approaches and technical
    aspects at Lariboisiere Hospital and review of the liter-
    ature. Neurosurg Rev. 2008;31(1):19–32.; discussion
    32–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-007-0097-1.
    9. Crockard HA, Sen CN. The transoral approach for
    the management of intradural lesions at the cranio-
    vertebral junction: review of 7 cases. Neurosurgery.
    1991;28(1):88–97. discussion 97–88
    10. Flores BC, Boudreaux BP, Klinger DR, Mickey BE,
    Barnett SL. The far-lateral approach for foramen mag-
    num meningiomas. Neurosurg Focus. 2013;35(6):E12.
    https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.10.FOCUS13332.
    11. Fraser JF, Nyquist GG, Moore N, Anand VK, Schwartz
    TH. Endoscopic endonasal minimal access approach
    to the clivus: case series and technical nuances.
    Neurosurgery. 2010;67(3 Suppl Operative):ons150–
    ons158.; discussion ons158. https://doi.
    org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000383130.80179.41.
    12. George B, Dematons C, Cophignon J. Lateral approach
    to the anterior portion of the foramen magnum.
    Application to surgical removal of 14 benign tumors:
    technical note. Surg Neurol. 1988;29(6):484–90.
    13. Heros RC. Lateral suboccipital approach for verte-
    bral and vertebrobasilar artery lesions. J Neurosurg.
    1986;64(4):559–62. https://doi.org/10.3171/
    jns.1986.64.4.0559.
    14. Kano T, Kawase T, Horiguchi T, Yoshida
    K. Meningiomas of the ventral foramen magnum and
    lower clivus: factors influencing surgical morbidity,
    the extent of tumour resection, and tumour recur-
    rence. Acta Neurochir. 2010;152(1):79–86.; discus-
    sion 86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-009-0511-2.
    15. Margalit NS, Lesser JB, Singer M, Sen C. Lateral
    approach to anterolateral tumors at the foramen
    magnum: factors determining surgical procedure.
    Neurosurgery. 2005;56(2 Suppl):324–36. discussion
    324–336
    16. Park HH, Lee KS, Hong CK. Vertebral artery trans-
    position via an extreme-lateral approach for anterior
    foramen magnum meningioma or Craniocervical
    junction tumors. World Neurosurg. 2016;88:154–65.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.12.073.
    17. Salas E, Sekhar LN, Ziyal IM, Caputy AJ, Wright
    DC. Variations of the extreme-lateral cranio-
    cervical approach: anatomical study and clini-
    cal analysis of 69 patients. J Neurosurg. 1999;90
    (2 Suppl):206–19.


A.M. Richardson et al.
Free download pdf