- PRETEND GENES 351
Traits: Large Phenotypic Eff ects and Pervasive Epistasis,” Proceedings of the National
Acad emy of Sciences, USA 105 (December 2008): 19910–19914.
- T. Bouchard, “IQ Similarity in Twins Reared Apart: Findings and Response to Criti-
cisms,” in Intelligence, Heredity and Environment, ed. R. J. Sternberg and E. Griger-
enko (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 126–162, 145.
- R. Plomin and I. J. Deary, “Ge ne tics and Intelligence Diff erences: Five Special Find-
ings,” Molecular Psychiatry 20 (September 2015): 98–108.
- W. Johnson, M. McGue, and W. G. Iacono, “Ge ne tic and Environmental Infl uences
on the Verbal- Perceptual- Image Rotation (VPR) Model of the Structure of Mental
Abilities,” Intelligence 35 (2007): 542–562, 548.
- S. W. Omholt, “From Beanbag Ge ne tics to Feedback Ge ne tics: Bridging the Gap
Between Regulatory Biology and Quantitative Ge ne tics Th eory,” in Th e Biology of
G e n e t i c D o m i n a n c e, ed. R. A. Veitia (Austin, Tex.: Eurekah/Landis, 2014), 1.
- T. J. Bouchard Jr., D. T. Lykken, M. McGue, N. L. Segal, and A. Tellegen, “Sources of
Human Psychological Diff erences: Th e Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart,”
Science 250 (October 1990): 223–250, 223; T. J. Bouchard Jr. and M. McGue, “Familial
Studies of Intelligence: A Review,” Science 212 (May 1981): 1055–1059, 1055.
- R. Plomin, “Nature and Nurture: Perspective and Prospective,” in Nature, Nurture,
and Psy chol ogy, ed. R. Plomin and G. E. McClearn (Washington, D.C.: American
Psychological Association, 1993), 457–483, 458
- See J. Joseph, Th e Trou ble with Twin Studies (Basingstoke, U.K.: Routledge, 2014).
- J. Joseph, Th e Trou ble with Twin Studies.
- J. Joseph, Th e Trou ble with Twin Studies.
20. J. Joseph, Th e Trou ble with Twin Studies.
21. Z. A. Kaminsky, T. Tang, S. C. Wang, C. Ptak, G. H. Oh, et al., “DNA Methylation
Profi les in Monozygotic and Dizygotic Twins,” Nature Ge ne tics 41 (February 2009):
240–245.
22. D. M. Evans and N. G. Martin, “Th e Validity of Twin Studies,” GeneScreen 1 (July
2000): 77–79.
23. J. Joseph, Th e Gene Illusion: Ge ne tic Research in Psychiatry and Psy chol ogy Under
the Microscope (Ross- on- Wye, U.K.: PCCS Books, 2003).
24. Y. Kovas, R. A. Weinberg, J. M. Th omson, and K. W. Fischer, “Th e Ge ne tic and Environ-
mental Origins of Learning Abilities and Disabilities in the Early School Years,” Mono-
graphs of the Society for Research in Child Development 72 (2007): vii–160, 6.
- K. Richardson and S. H. Norgate, “Th e Equal Environments Assumption of Classical
Twin Studies May Not Hold,” British Journal of Educational Psy chol ogy 75 (September
2005): 1–13.
26. D. Conley, E. Rauscher, C. Dawes, P. K. Magnusson, and M. L. Siegal, “Heritability
and the Equal Environments Assumption: Evidence from Multiple Samples of
Misclassifi ed Twins,” B e h a v i o r G e n e t i c s 43 (September 2013): 415–426.
27. R. J. Sternberg, “For Whom the Bell Curve Tolls: A Review of the Bell Curve,” Psy-
chological Science 5 (1995): 257–261, 260.
This content downloaded from 139.184.14.159 on Tue, 17 Oct 2017 13:59:14 UTC
