Genes, Brains, and Human Potential The Science and Ideology of Intelligence

(sharon) #1

  1. THE PROB LEMS OF EDUCATION ARE NOT GE NE TIC 371

  2. See, for example, D. C. Berliner and G. V. Glass (eds.), “50 Myths and Lies Th at
    Th reaten Amer i ca’s Public Schools: Th e Real Crisis in Education (New York: Teachers
    College Press, 2014), 63.

  3. G. Claxton and S. Meadows, “Brightening Up: How Children Learn to Be Gift ed,” in
    Routledge Companion to Gift ed Education, ed. T. Balchin et al. (London: Routledge,
    2008), 3–9, 5.

  4. B. Elsner and I. E. Isphording, “A Big Fish in a Small Pond,” Institute for the Study
    of Labor Discussion Paper 9121 (Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor, 2015).

  5. J. Boaler, “Ability and Mathe matics: Th e Mindset Revolution Th at Is Reshaping
    Education,” Forum 55, no. 1 (2013): 143–152, 146.

  6. D. K. Ginther and S. Kahn, “Comment on ‘Expectations of Brilliance Underlie Gender
    Distributions Across Academic Disciplines,’ ” Science 349 (July 2015): 341–343. And also
    A. Cimpian and S.- J. Lesli, “Response to Comment on ‘Expectations of Brilliance Underlie
    Gender Distributions Across Academic Disciplines,’ ” Science 349 (July 2015): 391–393, 391.

  7. J. Robinson- Cimpian, S. T. Lubienski, C. M. Ganley, and Y. Copur- Gencturk, “Teach-
    ers’ Perceptions of Students’ Mathe matics Profi ciency May Exacerbate Early Gender
    Gaps in Achievement,” Developmental Psy chol ogy 50 (April 2013): 1262–1281.

  8. See, for example, D. C. Berliner and G. V. Glass (eds.), 50 Myths and Lies Th at
    Th reaten Amer i ca’s Public Schools, 239.

  9. J. S. Armstrong, “Natu ral Learning in Higher Education,” Encyclopedia of the Sciences
    of Learning (London: Springer, 2011), 2426–2433, 2426.

  10. For example, H. Richardson, “Warning Over Eng land’s ‘Teacher Brain Drain,’ ”
    BBC News (February 26, 2016).

  11. National Union of Teachers, “Exam Factories? Th e Impact of Accountability Mea-
    sures on Children and Young People” (July 4, 2015): 39, teachers. org. uk.

  12. Quoted by K. Taylor, “At Success Acad emy Charter Schools, High Scores and Polar-
    izing Tactics,” New York Times (April 6, 2015). A version of this article appears in
    print on April 7, 2015, on page A1 of the New York edition.

  13. M. Richardson, C. Abraham, and R. Bond, “Psychological Correlates of University
    Students’ Academic Per for mance: A Systematic Review and Meta- Analy sis,” Psycho-
    logical Bulletin 138 (March 2012): 353–387.

  14. P. H. Schonemann and M. Heene, “Predictive Validities: Figures of Merit or Veils of
    Deception?” Psy chol ogy Science Quarterly 51 (August 2009): 195–215.

  15. M. Richardson et  al., “Psychological Correlates of University Students’ Academic
    Per for mance,” 353.

  16. I. C. Mc Manus and P. Richards, “Prospective Survey of Per for mance of Medical Stu-
    dents During Preclinical Years,” British Medical Journal 293 (July 1986): 124–127.

  17. M. Richardson et  al., “Psychological Correlates of University Students’ Academic
    Per for mance,” 372; Offi ce of Qualifi cations and Examinations Regulation (Ofqual),
    “Fit for Purpose? Th e View of the Higher Education Sector, Teachers and Employers
    on the Suitability of A Levels,” (April 2012): 46, www. ofqual. gov. uk / fi les / 2012 - 04 - 03 - fi t

    • for - purpose - a - levels. pdf.




This content downloaded from 139.184.14.159 on Tue, 17 Oct 2017 13:59:14 UTC
Free download pdf