The Evolution of Pragmatic Markers in English Pathways of Change

(Tina Meador) #1

308 References


Culpeper , Jonathan and Merja Kytö. 2010. Early Modern English dialogues:  Spoken
interaction as writing. Cambridge :  Cambridge University Press.
Curme , George O. 1931. A grammar of the English language. Vol. II:  Syntax. Boston,
MA :  D.C. Heath. [Reprint Essex, CT: Verbatim, 1977.]
Curme , George O. 1935. A grammar of the English language. Vol. I:  Parts of speech.
Boston :  D.C. Heath. [Reprint Essex, CT: Verbatim, 1977.]
Curzan , Anne. 2012. Revisiting the reduplicative copula with corpus- based evidence.
In Terttu Nevalainen and Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds.), The Oxford handbook of
the history of English, 211 – 221. Oxford :  Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/
oxfordhb/ 9780199922765.013.0020.
Dancygier , Barbara. 1998. Conditionals and prediction:  Time, knowledge and causa-
tion in conditional constructions. Cambridge :  Cambridge University Press.
Dancygier , Barbara. 2009. Review of English: Meaning and culture. By Anna Wierzbicka.
Journal of English Linguistics 37 ( 4 ), 380 – 384. DOI: 10.1177/ 0075424209332966.
Dancygier , Barbara and Eve Sweetser. 2005. Mental spaces in grammar: Conditional
constructions. Cambridge :  Cambridge University Press.
Davidse , Kristin , Tine Breban , Lieselotte Brems , and Tanja Mortelmans (eds.). 2012.
Grammaticalization and language change:  New refl ections. Amsterdam :  John
Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/ slcs.130.
Davies , H. W. 1869. An English grammar for the use of junior classes. Toronto :  Adam Miller.
Declerck , Renaat and Susan Reed. 2001. Conditionals:  A  comprehensive empirical
analysis. Berlin :  De Gruyter Mouton.
Degand , Liesbeth and Jacqueline Evers- Vermeul. 2015. Grammaticalization or prag-
maticalization of discourse markers? More than a terminological issue. Journal of
Historical Pragmatics 16 ( 1 ), 59 – 85. DOI: 10.1075/ jhp.12.1.03deg.
Degand , Liesbeth and Anne- Marie Simon- Vandenbergen. 2011. Introduction:  Gram-
maticalization and (inter)subjectifi cation of discourse markers. Linguistics 49 ( 2 ),
287 – 294. DOI: 10.1515/ LING.2011.008.
Dehé , Nicole. 2007. The relation between syntactic and prosodic parenthesis. In Dehé
and Kavalova (eds.), 261– 284. DOI: 10.1075/ la.106.15deh.
Dehé , Nicole. 2010. Sentence- initial I think (that) and I believe (that). Studies in
Language 34 ( 1 ), 36 – 74. DOI: 10.1075/ sl.34.1.02deh.
Dehé , Nicole and Yorkanka Kavalova. 2006. The syntax, pragmatics, and prosody of
parenthetical what. English Language and Linguistics 10 ( 2 ), 289 – 320. DOI:
10.1017/ S1360674306001936.
Dehé , Nicole and Yordanka Kavalova. 2007. Parentheticals: An introduction. In Dehé
and Kavalova (eds.), 1– 22. DOI: 10.1075/ la.106.03deh.
Dehé , Nicole and Yordanka Kavalova (eds.). 2007. Parentheticals. Amsterdam :  John
Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/ la.106.
Denis , Derek. 2015. The development of pragmatic markers in Canadian English.
Toronto, ON :  University of Toronto dissertation. http:// web.uvic.ca/ ~ddenis/ Site/
Denis thesis fi nal.pdf.
Denison , David. 1990. Auxiliary + impersonal in Old English. Folia Linguistica
Historica IX , 139 – 166.
Denison , David. 2001. Gradience and linguistic change. In Laurel J. Brinton (ed.),
Historical linguistics 1999: Selected papers from the 14th International Conference
on Historical Linguistics, 9– 13 August 1999 , 119 – 144. Amsterdam :  John
Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/ cilt.215.10den.

Free download pdf