References 309Denison , David. 2010. Category change in English with or without structural change.
In Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradience, gradualness
and grammaticalization , 105 – 128. Amsterdam : John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/
tsl.90.07den.
Dér , Csilla Ilona. 2010. On the status of discourse markers. Acta Linguistica Hungarica
57 ( 1 ), 3 – 38. DOI: 10.1556/ ALing.57.2010.1.1.
Diewald , Gabriele. 2006. Discourse particles and modal particles as grammatical ele-
ments. In Fischer (ed.), 403– 425.
Diewald , Gabriele. 2010. On some problem areas in grammaticalization studies. In Katrina
Stathi , Elke Gehweiler , and Ekkehard König (eds.), Grammaticalization: Current
views and issues , 17 – 50. Amsterdam : John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/ slcs.119.04die.
Diewald , Gabriele. 2011. Grammaticalization and pragmaticalization. In Narrog and
Heine (eds.), 450– 461.
Donaldson , E. Talbot. 1981. Adventures with the adversative conjunction in the general
prologue to the Canterbury Tales ; or what’s before the but? In Michael Benskin
and M. L. Samuels (eds.), So meny people, longages and tongues: Philological
essays in Scots and mediaeval English presented to Angus McIntosh , 355 – 366.
Edinburgh : Middle English Dialect Project.
Eaton , Roger , Olga Fischer , Willem Koopman , and Frederike van der Leek (eds.). 1985.
Papers from the 4th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics ,
Amsterdam : John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/ cilt.41.
Edmondson , Willis. 1981. Spoken discourse: A model for analysis. London : Longman.
Enkvist , Nils Erik. 1986. More about the textual functions of the Old English adverbial
þa. In Dieter Kastovsky and Aleksander Szwedek (eds.), Linguistics across his-
torical and geographical boundaries: In honour of Jacek Fisiak on the occasion of
his fi ftieth birthday. Vol. 1, 301 – 309. Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter.
Erman , Britt. 1986. Some pragmatic expressions in English conversation. In Tottie and
Bäcklund (eds.), 131– 147.
Erman , Britt. 1987. Pragmatic expressions in English: A study of “you know,” “you see”
and “I mean” in face- to- face conversation. Stockholm : Almqvist and Wiksell.
Erman , Britt. 2001. Pragmatic markers revisited with a focus on you know in adult
and adolescent talk. Journal of Pragmatics 33 , 1337 – 1359. DOI: 10.1016/
S0378- 2166(00)00066- 7.
Erman , Britt and Ulla- Britt Kotsinas. 1993. Pragmaticalization: the case of ba ’
and you know. Studies i modern språkvetenskap , 76 – 93. (Acta Universitatis
Stockholmiensis, Stockholm Studies in Modern Philology, New Series 10.)
Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.
Espinal , M. Teresa. 1991. The representation of disjunct constituents. Language 67 ,
726 – 762. DOI: 10.2307/ 415075.
Evans , Nicholas. 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In Irina Nicolaeva (ed.),
Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundations, 366 – 431. Oxford : Oxford
University Press.
Evans , Nicholas and David Wilkins. 2000. In the mind’s ear: Semantic extensions of per-
ception verbs in Australian languages. Language 76 ( 3 ), 546 – 592. DOI: 10.2307/
417135.
Finegan , Edward and Douglas Biber. 1995. That and zero complementisers in Late
Modern English: Exploring ARCHER from 1650– 1990. In Aarts and Meyer
(eds.), 241– 257.