310 References
Finell , Ann. 1989. Well now and then. Journal of Pragmatics 13 , 653 – 656.
von Fintel , Kai. 2000. Whatever. In Brendan Jackson and Tanya Matthews (eds.), Proceedings
from Semantics and Linguistic Theory, SALT X , 27 – 39. Ithaca, NY : CLC Publications.
Fischer , Kerstin (ed.). 2006. Approaches to discourse particles. Amsterdam : Elsevier.
Fischer , Olga. 2007a. The development of English parentheticals: A case of grammati-
calization? In Ute Smit et al. (eds.), Tracing English through time: Explorations in
language variation. A Festschrift for Herbert Schendl on the occasion of his 65th
birthday , 103 – 118. Vienna : Braumüller.
Fischer , Olga. 2007b. Morphosyntactic change: Formal and functional perspectives.
Oxford : Oxford University Press.
Fischer , Olga , Anette Rosenbach , and Dieter Stein (eds.). 2000. Pathways of
change: Grammaticalization in English. Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
DOI: 10.1075/ slcs.53.
Fitzmaurice , Susan. 2004. Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and the historical construc-
tion of interlocutor stance: From stance markers to discourse markers. Discourse
Studies 6 ( 4 ), 427 – 448. DOI: 10.1177/ 1461445604046585.
Fox Tree , Jean E. 2015. Discourse marking in writing. Discourse Studies 17 ( 1 ), 64 – 82.
DOI: 10.1177/ 1461445614557785.
Frank- Job , Barbara. 2006. A dynamic- interactional approach to discourse markers. In
Fischer (ed.), 359– 374.
Fraser , Bruce. 1975. Hedged performatives. In Cole and Morgan (eds.), 187 – 210.
Fraser , Bruce. 1988. Types of English discourse markers. Acta Linguistica Hungarica
38 , 19 – 33.
Fraser , Bruce. 1990. An approach to discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics 14 ( 3 ),
383 – 395. DOI: 10.1016/ 0378- 2166(90)90096- V.
Fraser , Bruce. 1996. Pragmatic markers. Pragmatics 6 ( 2 ), 167 – 190. DOI: 10.1075/
prag.6.2.03fra.
Fraser , Bruce. 1999. What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics 31 , 931 – 952.
DOI: 10.1016/ S0378- 2166(98)00101- 5.
Fraser , Bruce. 2009. An account of discourse markers. International Review of
Pragmatics 1 , 293 – 320. DOI: 10.1163/ 187730909X12538045489818.
Fried , Mirjam. 2009. Construction Grammar as a tool for diachronic analysis.
Constructions and Frames 1 ( 2 ), 262 – 291. DOI: 10.1075/ cf.1.2.04fri.
Fried , Mirjam and Jan- Ola Östman. 2005. Construction Grammar and spoken lan-
guage: The case of pragmatic particles. Journal of Pragmatics 37 , 1752 – 1778.
DOI: 10.1016/ j.pragma.2005.03.013.
Garley , Matt , Benjamin Slade , and Marina Terkourafi. 2010. A text in speech’s cloth-
ing: Discovering specifi c functions of formulaic expression in Beowulf and blogs.
In David Wood (ed.), Perspectives on formulaic language: Acquisition and com-
munication , 213 – 233. London : Continuum.
Gehweiler , Elke. 2008. From proper name to primary interjection: The case of gee!
Journal of Historical Pragmatics 9 , 71 – 93. DOI: 10.1075/ jhp.9.1.05geh.
Gehweiler , Elke. 2010. Interjections. In Jucker and Taavitsainen (eds.), 315 – 349.
Givón , Talmy. 1982. Evidentiality and epistemic space. Functions in Language 6 , 23 –
49. DOI: 10.1075/ sl.6.1.03giv.
Goldberg , Julia Anna. 1980. Discourse particles: An analysis of the role of y’know,
I mean, well, and actually in conversations. Cambridge: University of Cambridge
dissertation.