314 References
Kaltenböck , Gunther and Bernd Heine. 2014. Sentence grammar vs. thetical gram-
mar: Two competing domains? In Brian MacWhinney , Andrej Malchukov , and
Edith Moravcsik (eds.), Competing motivations in grammar and usage, 348 – 363.
Oxford : Oxford University Press.
Kaltenböck , Gunther , Bernd Heine , and Tania Kuteva. 2011. On thetical grammar.
Studies in Language 35 ( 4 ), 848 – 893. DOI: 10.1075/ sl.35.4.03kal.
Kärkkäinen , Elise. 2003. Epistemic stance in English conversation. A description of
its interactional functions, with a focus on I think. Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
DOI: 10.1075/ pbns.115.
Kärkkäinen , Elise. 2007. The role of I guess in conversational stancetaking. In Robert
Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interac-
tion , 183 – 219. Amsterdam : John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/ pbns.164.08kar.
Kay , Paul. 2013. The limits of (construction) grammar. In Thomas Hoffmann and
Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar , 32 – 48.
Oxford : Oxford University Press.
Kearns , Kate. 2007. Epistemic verbs and zero complementizer. English Language and
Linguistics 11 ( 3 ), 475 – 505. DOI: 10.1017/ S1360674307002353.
Keller , Eric. 1979. Gambits: Conversational strategy signals. Journal of Pragmatics 3.
219 – 238. DOI: 10.1016/ 0378- 2166(79)90032– 8.
Kiesling , Scott F. 2011 Stance in context: Affect, alignment and investment in the
analy sis of stancetaking. Presented at the iMean Conference. The University of
West England, Bristol, UK. April 15, 2011.
Kivimaa , Kirsti. 1968. Clauses in Chaucer introduced by conjunctions with appended
“that.” (Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum 43.1.) Helsinki : Societas
Scientiarum Fennica.
Kleiner , Brian. 1998. Whatever – its use in “pseudo- argument.” Journal of Pragmatics
30 , 589 – 613. DOI: 10.1016/ S0378- 2166(98)00030- 7.
Koivisto- Alanko , Päivi and Matti Rissanen. 2002. We give you to wit : Semantics and
grammaticalisation of the verb wit in the history of English. In Helena Raumolin-
Brunberg , Minna Nevala , Arja Nurmi , and Matti Rissanen (eds.), Variation past
and present: VARIENG studies on English for Terttu Nevalainen. Helsinki : Société
Néophilologique.
Koktová , Eva. 1986. Remarks on the semantics of sentence adverbials. Journal of
Pragmatics 10 , 27 – 40. DOI: 10.1016/ 0378- 2166(86)90098- 6.
König , Ekkehard. 1991. The meaning of focus particles: A comparative perspective.
London and New York : Routledge.
Koops , Christian and Martin Hilpert. 2009. The co- evolution of syntactic and pragmatic
complexity: Diachronic and cross- linguistic aspects of pseudoclefts. In T. Givón and
Masayoshi Shibatani (eds.), Syntactic complexity: Diachrony, acquisition, neuro-
cognition, evolution , 215 – 238. Amsterdam : John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/ tsl.85.09the.
Kortmann , Bernd. 1991. Free adjuncts and absolutes in English: Problems of control
and interpretation. London/ New York : Routledge.
Kranich , Svenja. 2010. The progressive in Modern English: A corpus- based study of
grammaticalization and related changes. Amsterdam : Rodopi.
Krug , Manfred. 1998. British English is developing a new discourse marker, innit?
A study in lexicalisation based on social, regional and stylistic variation. Arbeiten
aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 23 , 145 – 197.