316 References
López- Couso , María José and Belén Méndez-Naya. 2014b. From clause to pragmatic
marker: A study of the development of like parentheticals in American English.
Journal of Historical Pragmatics 15 ( 1 ), 36 – 61. DOI: 10.1075/ jhp.15.1.03lop.
López- Couso , María José and Belén Méndez-Naya. 2014c. On the origin of paren-
thetical constructions: Epistemic/ evidential parentheticals with seem and imper-
sonal think. In Irma Taavitsainen , Andreas H. Jucker , and Jukka Tuominen (eds.),
Diachronic corpus pragmatics , 189 – 212. Amsterdam : John Benjamins. DOI:
10.1075/ pbns.243.12lop.
Lyons , John. 1977. Semantics. 2 vols. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
Mair , Christian. 2006. Twentieth- century English: History, variation, and standardiza-
tion. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
Mair , Christian. 2013. Using “small” corpora to document ongoing grammatical
change. In Manfred Krug and Julia Schlüter (eds.), Research methods in language
variation and change, 181 – 194. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
Malone , Kemp. 1951. Chapters on Chaucer. Baltimore, MD : Johns Hopkins Press.
Marchand , Hans. 1969. The categories and types of Present- day English word-
formation: A synchronic- diachronic approach , 2nd edn. Munich : Beck’sche
Verlags Buchhandlung.
Margolies , Lynn. 2012. Defending against “I’m just saying” and other verbal annoy-
ances. Psych Central. http:// psychcentral.com/ lib/ defending- against- im- just-
saying- and- other- verbal- annoyances/ 00012762 (accessed August 9, 2015).
Masui , Michio. 1964. The structure of Chaucer’s rime words: An exploration into the
poetic language of Chaucer. Tokyo : Kenkyusha.
Matlock , Teenie. 1989. Metaphor and the grammaticalization of evidentials. In Kira
Hall , Michael Meacham , and Richard Shapiro (eds.), Proceedings of the fi f-
teenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 215 – 225. Berkeley,
CA : Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Mehl , Dieter. 1974. The audience of Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde. In Beryl Rowland
(ed.), Chaucer and Middle English studies in honour of Rossell Hope Robbins ,
173 – 189. London : George Allen & Unwin.
Méndez- Naya , Belén. 2006. Adjunct, modifi er, discourse marker: On the various func-
tions of right in the history of English. Folia Linguistica Historica 27 ( 1– 2 ), 141 –
195. DOI: 10.1515/ fl in.27.1- 2.141.
Meurman- Solin , Anneli. 2012. The connectives and , for , but , and only as clause and
discourse type indicators in 16th- and 17th- century epistolary prose. In Anneli
Meurman- Solin , María José López- Couso , and Bettelou Los (eds.), Information
structure and syntactic change in the history of English , 164 – 196. Oxford : Oxford
University Press.
Michel , Jean- Baptiste , Yuan Kui Shen , Aviva Presser Aiden , Adrian Veres , Matthew K.
Gray , William Brockman , et al. 2011. Quantitative analysis of culture using millions
of digitized books. Science 331 ( 6014 ), 176 – 182. DOI: 10.1126/ science.1199644.
Mitchell , Bruce. 1985. Old English syntax. Vol. I: Concord, the parts of speech, and
the sentence , Vol. II: Subordination, independent elements, and element order.
Oxford : Clarendon Press.
Mittwoch , Anita 1977. How to refer to one’s own words: Speech- act modifying
adverbials and the performative analysis. Journal of Linguistics 13 , 177 – 189.
DOI: 10.1017/ S0022226700005387.