Ecology, Conservation and Management of Wild Pigs and Peccaries

(Axel Boer) #1
Part II: Species Accounts

132


density, but abundant in some areas; or of limited distribution,
but abundant and not considered threatened and abundant/
well-represented in protected areas (IUCN Red List category of
Least Concern: Seydack 2016). This general status assessment
may require revision in the future as human population pres-
sures result in increasing subsistence and commercial bushmeat
hunting and bushpigs becoming increasingly rare outside of
protected areas. Although there is little indication that the dis-
tribution of the species has been substantially altered through
human activities, localized declines and range contractions in
some areas occur due to habitat destruction or as result of hunt-
ing and local consumption (Vercammen et al. 1993). However,

due to their preferred densely vegetated habitat, nocturnal hab-
its and relatively high reproductive potential, it has proven diffi-
cult to lastingly eliminate bushpigs from larger tracts of densely
vegetated areas (Seydack 2013).

Status in Captivity
In general, there is a very low incidence of bushpigs in captivity.
Unlike Potamochoerus porcus, the red river hog, bushpigs, P. l a r-
vatus, are found only in relatively few prominent zoos, such as
the San Diego Zoo (USA) and the Hellabrunn Zoo (München,
Germany).

References
Attwell, C. A. M. & Bearder, S. (1976). The
bushpigs of Narina. African Wildlife
30 (2): 12–13.
Beuerle, W. (1975).
Freilanduntersuchungen zum Kampf-
und Sexualverhalten des europäischen
Wildschweines (Sus scrofa L).
Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 39:
211–258.
Boomker, J. (2007). Helminth infections:
wildlife. Pretoria: University of
Pretoria.
Breytenbach, G. J. (1977). An ecological
study of the bushpig (Potamochoerus
porcus – 1758) of the eastern shores of
Lake St Lucia, with particular reference
to feeding. BSc Hons (Zoology) thesis,
Department of Zoology, University of
Pretoria.
(1979). The enigmatic bushpig. African
Wildlife 33 (5): 48–49.
Breytenbach, G. J. & Skinner, J. D. (1982).
Diet, feeding and habitat utilization
by bushpigs Potamochoerus porcus
Linnaeus. South African Journal of
Wildlife Research 12: 1–7.
Cooke, H. B. S. & Wilkinson, A. F. (1978).
Suidae and Tayassuidae. In Maglio, V.
J. & Cooke, H. B. S. (eds.), Evolution
of African mammals. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
Cowling, R. M. (1982). Vegetation
studies in the Humansdorp region
of the Fynbos Biome. PhD thesis,
Department of Botany, University of
Cape Town.
d’Huart, J. P. (1978). Ecologie
de l’Hylochère (Hylochoerus
meinertzhageni Thomas) au Parc
National des Virunga. Exploration du
Parc National des Virunga. Deuxième
Série, Fascicule 25, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Frädrich, H. (1967). Das Verhalten
der Schweine (Suidae, Tayassuidae)
und Flusspferde (Hippopotamidae).
Handbuch der Zoologie 8 (10): 1–44.

(1974). A comparison of behaviour in
the Suidae. IUCN Publications (New
Series), No. 24, Vol. 1: Paper No. 6:
133–143.
Gaidet, N., Hervé, F. & Nyahuma, C.
(2003). A participatory counting
method to monitor populations of
large mammals in non-protected
areas: a case study of bicycle counts
in the Zambezi Valley, Zimbabwe.
Biodiversity and Conservation 12:
1571–1585.
Geist, V. (1978). On weapons, combat
and ecology. In Kranes, L., Pliner,
P. & Alloway, T. (eds.), Aggression,
dominance and individual
spacing (advances in the study of
communication and affect). New York,
NY: Plenum, Vol. 4, pp. 1–30.
Ghiglieri, M. P., Butynski, T. M.,
Struhsaker, T. T., et al. (1982).
Bushpig (Potamochoerus porcus)
polychromatism and ecology in Kibale
Forest, Uganda. African Journal of
Ecology 20: 231–236.
Gray, J. (1868). Synopsis of the species of
pigs (Suidae) in the British Museum.
Proceedings of the Zoological Society,
No. II.
Groves, C. & Grubb, P. (2011). Ungulate
taxonomy. 5. Suidae. Baltimore, MD:
The John Hopkins University Press.
Grubb, P. (1993). The Afrotropical
Suids Phacochoerus, Hylochoerus
and Potamochoerus: the bushpigs
(Potamochoerus porcus and
Potamochoerus larvatus). In Oliver,
W. L. R. (ed.), Pigs, peccaries and
hippos: status survey and conservation
action plan. Gland: IUCN/SSC Pigs
and Peccaries Specialist Group; IUCN/
SSC Hippo Specialist Group, IUCN,
pp. 66–75.
Gundlach, H. (1968). Brutfürsorge,
Brutpflege, Verhaltensontogonese und
Tagesperiodik beim Europäischen

Wildschwein (Sus scrofa L.). Zeitschrift
für Tierpsychologie 25: 955–995.
Haltenorth, T. (1963). Die Klassifikation
der Säugetiere 18. Ordnung Paarhufer,
Artiodactyla. Handbuch der Zoologie
8 (1): 1–167.
Horak, I. G., Boomker, J. & Flamand,
J. R. B. (1991). Ixodid ticks and lice
infesting red duikers and bushpig in
northeastern Natal. Onderstepoort
Journal of Veterinary Research 58:
281–284.
Jarvis, M. J. F., Currie, M. H. & Palmer,
N. G. (1980). Food of crowned eagles
in the Cape Province, South Africa.
Ostrich 51: 215–218.
Jobaert, A. J. (1958). Le Potamochère.
Zooleo 6 (44): 145–154.
Jones, M. A. (1978). A scent marking
gland in the bushpig Potamochoerus
porcus (Linn., 1758). Arnoldia
Rhodesia 8(30): 1–4.
(1984). Seasonal changes in the diet of
bushpig, Potamochoerus porcus Linn.,
in the Matopos National Park. South
African Journal of Wildlife Research 14:
97–100.
Jori, F. & Bastos, A. D. S. (2009). The role
of suids in the epidemiology of African
swine fever. Review. EcoHealth 6 (2):
296–310.
Kingdon, J. (1979). East African
mammals. Vol. IIIB. London:
Academic Press.
Lönnberg, E. (1910). Contributions
to the knowledge of the genus
Potamochoerus. Arkiv för Zoologi
7 (6): 1–40.
Mason, D. R. (1982). Studies on the
biology and ecology of the warthog
Phacochoerus aethiopicus sundevalli
Lönnberg, 1908 in Zululand. DSc
thesis (Wildlife Management),
University of Pretoria.
McNab, B. K. (1986). The influence
of food habits on the energetics

.014

12:38:17

http://www.ebook3000.com

Free download pdf