Systems Biology (Methods in Molecular Biology)

(Tina Sui) #1
solutions of differential equations, Multi Agent Systems appear as a
more intuitive and rewarding approach, particularly in the initial
exploration phase of complex phenomena.
The applications presented here provided a description of the
model’s dynamic response to various combinations of endogenous
and exogenous factors, useful in the development of new ideas and
mechanisms. In some cases, however, whenever the MAS showed
able to faithfully reproduce the observed data trends, its aim
exceeded the purely descriptive dimension and a quantitative
answer to some specific mechanistic questions could be proposed
and empirically tested.
Finally, it is fair to stress that, due to the prevailing interest of
the author, a major emphasis has been given to only a few among
the many characteristic features of MAS, namely: 1) the straightfor-
ward account of the environmental force-fields influence on the
agents behavior, and 2) the synchronous and/or correlated activa-
tion exerted by agents upon each other.
Dealing with a much wider range of phenomena the euristic
power of MAS could also emerge [10] as an outstanding tool to
face many relevant issues typical of System Biology.

References



  1. Holland J (1996) Hidden order: how adapta-
    tion builds complexity. Addison-Wesley,
    Reading

  2. Laughlin R (2005) Un universo diverso: rein-
    ventare la Fisica da cima a fondo. Codice,
    Torino

  3. Rodgers J, Nicewander W (1988) Thirteen
    ways to look at the correlation coefficient. Am
    Stat 42(1):59–66

  4. Bar-Yam Y (1998) Dynamics of complex sys-
    tems. Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA

  5. Borschev A (2016) The big book of simulation
    modeling.www.anylogic.com

  6. DeToni F, Bernardi E (2009) “Il pianeta degli
    agenti” UTET-Torino. UTET-Torino, Turin

  7. Holland J (1992) Adaptation in natural and
    artificial systems: an introductory analysis with
    applications to biology, control and artificial
    intelligence. The MIT Press, Cambridge MA

  8. Wolfram S (2002) A new kind of science. Wol-
    fram Media, Inc, Champaign, IL

  9. Wilenski U (1999) http://ccl.northwestern.
    edu/netlogo/

  10. Wilensky U, Rand W (2015) Introduction to
    agent-based modeling: modeling natural,
    social and engineered complex systems. The
    MIT Press, Cambridge MA

  11. Colosimo A (2011) Multi Agent Simulators:
    flexible tools to reproduce collective behaviors,
    Biophys Bioeng Lett 4(2):34–41

  12. Institute for Systems Biology.https://www.
    systemsbiology.org

  13. Wyman J, Gill S (1990) Binding and linkage:
    functional chemistry of biological macromole-
    cules. University Science Books, Sausalito, CA

  14. Bizzarri M, Cucina A, Biava P, Proietti S,
    D’Anselmi F, Dinicola S, Pasqualato A, Lisi E
    (2011) Embriyonic morphogenetic field
    induces phenotypic reversion in cancer cells:
    review article. Curr Pharm Biotechnol
    12:243–253

  15. Leao A (1944) Spreading depression of activity
    in the cerebral cortex. J Neurophysiol
    7:359–390

  16. Lauritzen M (1994) Pathophysiology of the
    migraineaura. the spreading depression theory.
    Brain 117:199–210

  17. Colosimo A (2008) Biological simulations by
    autonomous agents: two examples using the
    netlogo environment. Biophys Bioeng Lett 1
    (3):40–50

  18. Hines M, Carnevale N (2001) Neuron: A tool
    for neuroscientists. Neuroscientist 7:123–135

  19. Prinz A (2008) Understanding epilepsy
    through network modeling. Proc Natl Acad
    Sci U S A 105(16):5953–5954


Multi-agent Simulations of Population Behavior... 325
Free download pdf