5 Tolerance to Combined Stress of Drought and Salinity in Barley 121
Volis S, Mendlinger S, Orlovsky N. Variability in phenotypic traits in core and peripheral popula-
tions of wild barley Hordeum spontaneum Koch. Hereditas. 2000;133:235–47.
Vysotskaya L, Hedley PE, Sharipova G, Veselov D, Kudoyarova G, Morris J, Jones HG. Effect of
salinity on water relations of wild barley plants differing in salt tolerance. AoB Plants. 2010.
doi:10.1093/aobpla/plq006.
Wang Y, Nil N. Changes in chlorophyll, ribulose biphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase, glycine be-
taine content, photosynthesis and transpiration in Amaranthus tricolor leaves during salt stress.
J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 2000;75:623–27.
Wang B, Chee PW. Application of advanced backcross quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis in
crop improvement. J Plant Breed Crop Sci. 2010;2:221–32.
Wardlaw I, Willenbrink J. Mobilization of fructan reserves and changes in enzyme activities in
wheat stems correlate with water stress during kernel filling. New Phytol. 2000;148:413–22.
Waugh R, Jannink JL, Muehlbauer GJ, Ramsay L. The emergence of whole genome association
scans in barley. Currt Opin. Plant Biol. 2009;12:218–22.
Widodo, Patterson JH, Newbigin E, Tester M, Baci A. Metabolic responses to salt stress of barley
( Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars, Sahara and Clipper, which differ in salinity tolerance. J Exp
Bot. 2009;60:4089–103.
Witzel K, Weidner A, Surabhi GK, Varshney RK, Kunze G, BuckSorlin GH, Borner A, Mock HP.
Comparative analysis of the grain proteome fraction in barley genotypes with contrasting salin-
ity tolerance during germination. Plant Cell Environ. 2009;33:211–22.
Wu D, Cai S, Chen M, Ye L, Chen Z, Zhang H, Dai F, Wu FB, Zhang GP. Tissue metabolic re-
sponses to salt stress in wild and cultivated barley. PloS ONE. 2013;8:e55431.
Xue DW, Huang YZ, Zhang XQ, Wei K, Westcott S, Li CD, Chen MC, Zhang GP, Lance R. Iden-
tification of QTLs associated with salinity tolerance at late growth stage in barley. Euphytica.
2009;169:187–96.
Xu D, Duan X, Wang B, Hong B, Ho THD, Wu R. Expression of a late embryogenesis related
protein gene, HVA1, from barley confers tolerance to water deficit and salt stress in transgenic
rice. Plant Physiol. 1996;110:249–57.
Yang F, Xu X, Xiao X, Li C. Responses to drought stress in two poplar species originating from
Water & nitrogen use efficiency in plants and crops. Marston, Lincolnshire. UK: 15–16 De-
cember 2010; 2009.
Yousfi S, Serret MD, Araus JL, Draye X, Foulkes J, Hawkesford M, Murchie E. A comparative
effect of salinity and drought on growth, ion concentration and δ13C and δ15N in barley. As-
socia Appl Biol. 2010;105:73–81.
Yousfi S, Serret MD, Márquez AJ, Voltas J, Araus JL. Combined use of δ13C, δ18O and δ15N
tracks nitrogen metabolism and genotypic adaptation of durum wheat to salinity and water
deficit. New Phytol. 2012;194:230–44.
Zahra J, Nazim H, Cai S, Han Y, Wu D, Zhang B, Haider SI, Zhang G. The influence of salinity
on cell ultrastructures and photosynthetic apparatus of barley genotypes differing in salt stress
tolerance. Acta Physiol Planta. 2014;36(5):1261–9.
Zhang J, Jia W, Yang J, Ismail AM. Role of ABA in integrating plant responses to drought and salt
stresses. Field Crops Res. 2006a;97:111–9.
Zhang B, Pan X, Cobb GP, Anderson TA. Plant microRNA: a small regulatory molecule with big
impact. Dev Biol. 2006b;289:3–16.
Zhang X, Liu S, Takano T. Overexpression of a mitochondrial ATP synthase small subunit gene
( AtMtATP6) confers tolerance to several abiotic stresses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Ara-
bidopsis thaliana. Biotech Lett. 2008;30:1289–94.
Zhang H, Han B, Wang T, Chen SX, Li HY. Mechanisms of plant salt response, insights from
proteomics. J Proteome Res. 2012;11:49–67.
Zhao J, Sun H, Dai H, Zhang G, Wu F. Difference in response to drought stress among Tibet wild
barley genotypes. Euphytica. 2010;172:395–403.
Zhou M, Li D, Li Z, Hu Q, Yang C, Zhu L, Luo H. Constitutive expression of a miR319 gene alters
plant development and enhances salt and drought tolerance in transgenic creeping bentgrass.
Plant Physiol. 2013;161:1375–91.