11 Combined Stresses in Forests 243
McDowell NG, Fisher RA, Xu C, Domec JC, Hölttä T, Mackay DS, et al. Evaluating theories of
drought-induced vegetation mortality using a multimodel-experiment framework. New Phytol.
2013;200(2):304–21.
Metcalf CJE, McMahon SM, Clark JS. Overcoming data sparseness and parametric con-
straints in modeling of tree mortality: a new nonparametric Bayesian model. Can J For Res.
2009;39(9):1677–87. doi:10.1139/X09-083.
Mitchell PJ, Veneklaas EJ, Lambers H, Burgess SSO. Using multiple trait associations to de-
fine hydraulic functional types in plant communities of south-western Australia. Oecologia.
2008;158:385–97.
Mitchell PJ, Battaglia M, Pinkard EA. Counting the costs of multiple stressors: is the whole greater
than the sum of the parts? Tree Physiol. 2013;33(5):447–50.
Mitchell PJ, O’Grady AP, Tissue DT, White DA, Ottenschlaeger ML, Pinkard EA. Drought re-
sponse strategies define the relative contributions of hydraulic dysfunction and carbohydrate
depletion during tree mortality. New Phytol. 2013;197(3):862–72.
Mitchell PJ, O’Grady AP, Hayes KR, Pinkard EA. Exposure of trees to drought-induced die-
off is defined by a common climatic threshold across different vegetation types. Ecol Evol.
2014;4(7):1088–101.
Mitchell PJ, O’Grady AP, Tissue DT, Worledge D, Pinkard EA. Co-ordination of growth, gas ex-
change and hydraulics define the carbon safety margin in tree species with contrasting drought
strategies. Tree Physiol. 2014;34:443–58.
Mueller-Dombois D. Perspectives for an etiology of stand-level dieback. Annu Rev Ecol Syst.
1986;17:221–43. (ArticleType: research-article/ Full publication date: 1986/ Copyright © 1986
Annual Reviews).
Mueller-Dombois D. Natural dieback in forests. Bioscience. 1987;37(8):575–83.
Mueller-Dombois D. Towards a unifying theory for stand-level dieback. Geojournal.
1988;17(2):249–51.
Munns R, Termaat A. Whole-plant responses to salinity. Funct Plant Biol. 1986;13(1):143–60.
Niinemets Ü. Responses of forest trees to single and multiple environmental stresses from seed-
lings to mature plants: Past stress history, stress interactions, tolerance and acclimation. For
Ecol Manage. 2010;260(10):1623–39.
Ogle K, Barber J. Bayesian data-model integration in plant physiological and ecosystem ecology.
In: Lüttge U, Beyschlag W, Murata J, editors. Progress in Botany. Springer Berlin Heidelberg;
- p. 281–311.
Peñuelas J, Sardans J, Estiarte M, Ogaya R, Carnicer J, Coll M, et al. Evidence of current
impact of climate change on life: a walk from genes to the biosphere. Glob Change Biol.
2013;19(8):2303–38.
Pinkard EA, Eyles A, O’Grady AP. Are gas exchange responses to resource limitation and defolia-
tion linked to source: sink relationships? Plant Cell Environ. 2011;34(10):1652–65.
Pinkard EA, Battaglia M, Roxburgh S, O’Grady AP. Estimating forest net primary production
under changing climate: adding pests into the equation. Tree Physiol. 2011;31(7):686–99.
Pook EW, Forrester R. Factors influencing dieback and drought-affected dry sclerophyll forest tree
species. Aust For Res. 1984;14:201–17.
Poyatos R, Aguadé D, Galiano L, Mencuccini M, Martínez-Vilalta J. Drought-induced defoliation
and long periods of near-zero gas exchange play a key role in accentuating metabolic decline
of Scots pine. New Phytol. 2013;200:388–401.
Rammig A, Jupp T, Thonicke K, Tietjen B, Heinke J, Ostberg S, et al. Estimating the risk of Ama-
zonian forest dieback. New Phytol. 2010;187(3):694–706.
Repo T, Kalliokoski T, Domisch T, Lehto T, Mannerkoski H, Sutinen S, et al. Effects of timing of
soil frost thawing on Scots pine. Tree Physiol. 2005;25(8):1053–62.
Repo T, Lehto T, Finér L. Delayed soil thawing affects root and shoot functioning and growth in
Scots pine. Tree Physiol. 2008;28(10):1583–91.
Rivas-Ubach A, Gargallo-Garriga A, Sardans J, Oravec M, Mateu-Castell L, Pérez-Trujillo M,
et al. Drought enhances folivory by shifting foliar metabolomes in Quercus ilex trees. New
Phytol. 2014;202(3):874–85.