258 S. Bansal
Kerstiens G. Cuticular water permeability and its physiological significance. J Exp Bot.
1996;47(12):1813–32.
Kessler A, Baldwin IT. Plant responses to insect herbivory: the emerging molecular analysis. Annu
Rev Plant Biol. 2002;53(1):299–328.
Koricheva J, Larsson S, Haukioja E. Insect performance on experimentally stressed woody plants:
a meta-analysis. Annu Rev Entomol. 1998;43(1):195–216.
Langenheim JH. Plant resins. Am Sci. 1990;78:16–24.
Larcher W. Physiological plant ecology: ecophysiology and stress physiology of functional groups.
4th ed. New York: Springer; 2003. p. 513.
Larsson S. Stressful times for the plant stress: insect performance hypothesis. Oikos.
1989;56:277–83.
Leshem Y, Kuiper P. Is there a GAS (general adaptation syndrome) response to various types of
environmental stress? Biol Plant. 1996;38(1):1–18.
Lombardero MJ, Ayres MP. Factors influencing bark beetle outbreaks after forest fires on the
Iberian Peninsula. Environ Entomol. 2011;40(5):1007–18.
Lorio PL, Sommers RA. Evidence of competition for photosynthates between growth processes
and oleoresin synthesis in Pinus taeda L. Tree Physiol. 1986;2:301–6.
Maherali H, Pockman WT, Jackson RB. Adaptive variation in the vulnerability of woody plants to
xylem cavitation. Ecology. 2004;85(8):2184–99.
Mattson WJ, Haack RA. The role of drought in outbreaks of plant-eating insects. Bioscience.
1987;37(2):110–8.
McDowell N. Mechanisms linking drought, hydraulics, carbon metabolism, and vegetation
mortality. Plant Physiol. 2011;155(3):1051–9.
McDowell N, Pockman WT, Allen CD, Breshears DD, Cobb N, Kolb T, et al. Mechanisms of plant
survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to
drought? New Phytol. 2008;178(4):719–39.
Meier C, Newton R, Puryear J, Sen S. Physiological responses of Loblolly pine ( Pinus taeda)
seedlings to drought stress: osmotic adjustment and tissue elasticity. J Plant Physiol.
1992;140(6):754–60.
Mitchell PJ, Battaglia M, Pinkard EA. Counting the costs of multiple stressors: is the whole greater
than the sum of the parts? Tree Physiol. 2013;33(5):447–50.
Myers JH, Bazely D. Thorns, spines, prickles, and hairs: are they stimulated by herbivory and
do they deter herbivores. In: Tallamy DW, Raupp MJ, editors. Phytochemical induction by
herbivores. New York: Wiley; 1991. pp. 325–44.
Neely D. Healing of wounds on trees. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 1970;95(5):536–40.
Niinemets U. Responses of forest trees to single and multiple environmental stresses from
seedlings to mature plants: past stress history, stress interactions, tolerance and acclimation.
For Ecol Manage. 2010;260(10):1623–39.
Ohgushi T. Indirect interaction webs: herbivore-induced effects through trait change in plants.
Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2005;36:81–105.
Oren R, Schulze E-D, Matyssek R, Zimmermann R. Estimating photosynthetic rate and an-
nual carbon gain in conifers from specific leaf weight and leaf biomass. Oecologia.
1986;70(2):187–93.
Orians C, Thorn A, Gómez S. Herbivore-induced resource sequestration in plants: why bother?
Oecologia. 2011;167(1):1–9.
Osakabe Y, Osakabe K, Shinozaki K, Tran LSP. Response of plants to water stress. Front Plant
Sci. 2014;5:1–8.
Parmesan C, Yohe G. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural
systems. Nature. 2003;421(6918):37–42.
Poorter H, Villar R. The fate of acquired carbon in plants: chemical composition and construction
costs. In: Bazzaz FA, Jones B, editors. Plant resource allocation. New York: Academic; 1997.
pp. 39–72.
Price PW. The plant vigor hypothesis and herbivore attack. Oikos. 1991;62:244–51.