SCIENCE
Sebastian Faulks
Desperate Remedies
Psychiatry and the Mysteries
of Mental Illness
by Andrew Scull
Allen Lane £25 pp494
This is a chilling book. It is the
story of how we have
struggled to deal with the
most human of ailments:
insanity. No one knows why
Homo sapiens is more broken
than other species: why one
in 100 of us hear voices,
hallucinate and are tormented
by delusions; why more than
one in ten will seek help for
less florid but equally
persistent symptoms of
mental disorder.
Andrew Scull begins his
story with the 19th-century
state institutions in the United
States. Though Bedlam
hospital had existed in
London since 1247, the new
asylums in the US and Europe
were the fruit of post-
Enlightenment optimism: the
proper study of mankind is
man. But there was a
problem. Gathering together
the psychotics, the alcoholics,
the depressed, the phobic, the
manic and, in great numbers,
the syphilitic, the epileptic,
the brain-damaged and,
shamefully, the illegitimate,
blind, deaf and troublesome
made it clear by the end of the
19th century that the asylums
could not cure or even help
them; they could only
“warehouse” them.
Psychiatry was from the
start disdained by the medical
mainstream. It had no clear
disease categories, no reliable
medicines and no cures. Cold
baths, hot baths, stupefying
drugs, restraints... Most
“mad doctors” (Britain) or
“alienists” (US) dishing out this
stuff were not even medically
qualified. The German
physician Emil Kraepelin
(1856-1926) tried to dignify
the profession and by
careful study made a
distinction between what
was (catastrophically, but
not by him) christened
“schizophrenia” and “manic
depressive psychosis” (now
known as bipolar disorder).
Kraepelin was the patron of
the biological school, which
believed that mental disorders
were a form of brain disease
with a cause that, once
discovered, would be curable.
Almost 100 years after his
death, we’re still waiting for
any cause or combination of
causes to be found.
Scull’s fascinating and
enraging book is the story of
the quacks and opportunists
who have claimed to offer
cures for mental illness. Here
are the doctors who thought
infection was to blame and
took out teeth, tonsils,
wombs, anything that might
be responsible, especially in
a woman. Here are the men
(always men) who put
patients to sleep in insulin
comas and those who tried to
burn off madness by inducing
malarial fever. Here are the
ones who stuffed a kitchen ice
pick through the eye socket
and cut out anything they
came across inside the brain
(“lobotomy”). Here are the
ones who strapped patients to
a table and passed electric
shocks through their temples
(electroconvulsive therapy, or
ECT) on the grounds that the
quasi-epileptic seizure so
induced would cure them of
unhappiness or delusion.
What all these people had
Fighting the
culture warriors
Douglas Murray on western values
and why they are worth defending
SOCIETY
Robert Colvile
The War on the West
How to Prevail in the Age of
Unreason by Douglas Murray
HarperCollins £20 pp320
One of the central pillars of
Chinese foreign policy is that
no country should interfere in
another’s internal affairs. Yet
there is one glaring exception.
Its foreign ministry’s daily
press conferences are littered
with references to America’s
present and historic sins.
The other day the very first
question helpfully teed up a
long rant about how “ethnic
minorities in the US live under
unease, inequality and fear”.
Douglas Murray’s new
book, The War on the West,
argues that “a cultural war...
is being waged remorselessly
against all the roots of the
western tradition and against
everything good that the
western tradition has
produced”. The warriors
concerned are a home-grown
cadre of activist academics
who are indoctrinating an
entire generation to believe
that every aspect of British
and American history and
society is infected by
prejudice. “Everything in the
past is seen as racist, and so
everything in the past is
tainted.” The flipside of this
is that “if other countries do
have any racism, it must be
because the West exported
the vice to them”. In
obsessing over our own sins,
we allow others — not least
China — to paper over theirs.
This is not a new thesis or
anything like it. The same
depressing case has been
made by others before,
including Murray in his
regular Spectator articles
and previous books on
identity politics and (more
controversially) Islam and
immigration. What is new is
not just the additional focus
on the international context,
but the verve with which he
makes his case.
Murray shows not just
how every aspect of western
society has come under the
iconoclasts’ gaze — from
mathematics to music, Kew
Gardens to Jane Austen — but
how flimsy their case often is.
The poet Ted Hughes was put
on the naughty step by the
British Library for being
descended from Nicholas
Ferrar, who in turn was
“deeply involved” with the
London Virginia Company.
The only problem, apart from
the 338 years between them,
was that none of that colonial
wealth had trickled down by
the time Hughes was born in
rural Yorkshire. And that
Ferrar did not have any
children. And was the author
of a pamphlet attacking
slavery. Written before the
British slave trade even began.
There is, obviously, an
agenda at work here. As
Murray says, Karl Marx was
guilty of horrendous racism
and antisemitism, but his
statues, unlike those of
Washington and even
Lincoln, remain untoppled.
But then, as Murray argues,
such concepts as “evidence”
and “justice” do not seem to
matter much to the new
Savonarolas. They start from
the position that whiteness
is the fundamental problem.
And their logic is, he says,
“the same one favoured by
witch-dunkers in the Middle
Ages”: white people who
object to being called racist
are simply providing further
evidence of their racism.
Wokeness is, in other
words, not an academic
movement but something
closer to a religion — the
complex liturgy, the divide
between the elect and the
damned, the obsession with
the excommunication of
heretics. And of course our
mushy, self-hating churches
have fully surrendered to it.
Murray’s central argument
is that western civilisation,
and the western canon, are
not just worth defending but
must be defended. For
example, as awful as the
slave trade was, the British
government devoted a vast
amount of money, and a sixth
of its naval resources, to
trying to abolish it. Murray
also points out that more
slaves probably went east to
the Arab states than west
across the Atlantic. (One
reason we do not realise
this is that they were
systematically castrated,
leaving very few to make any
modern-day demands for
reparations.) And today it is
estimated that there are more
than 40 million living in
slavery worldwide — whose
plight gets a fraction of the
attention it should.
Yet what I did hope for was
more on how those of us who
also believe in the virtues of
Shakespeare, Austen, Bach
and Bernini can fight back.
Murray makes a convincing
and often terrifying case that
the barbarians are at the
gates. Perhaps his next book
can tell us more about
how to man the walls. c
Protection Protests in
Parliament Square
BOOKS
DOMINIC LIPINSKI/PA
Psychiatry
— a quack
medicine?
There are few heroes in this enraging
study of our attempt to cure mental illness
30 24 April 2022