The Sunday Times - UK (2022-04-24)

(Antfer) #1

The Sunday Times April 24, 2022 19


million-pound property portfolio in the
UK whose aluminium company had sup-
plied the Russian military, according to
evidence given to parliament. It would be
another four years before Britain would
sanction Deripaska — and only then after
the second invasion of Ukraine.
The US had been consistently more
proactive in sanctioning alleged Putin
allies. After the 2014 invasion, it had
imposed sanctions on oligarchs such as
Vladimir Yakunin, a former business
partner and ex-KGB colleague of Putin.
Yakunin has family ties in the UK and is
said to have amassed a fortune from run-
ning the state-owned Russian Railways.
He has written a book, published in Lon-
don in 2018, which is supportive of Putin.
But he was sanctioned by Britain only this
month.
At the time Britain complied with the
EU sanction regime which had intro-
duced a series of economic and individ-
ual sanctions after the 2014 invasion.
However the sanctions on named people
were chiefly targeted at soldiers, officials
and politicians linked to the Crimea
incursion. Very few of Putin’s oligarchs
were targeted.
In the months after the Salisbury
attack, Johnson said the lack of action
compared with the US was because Brit-
ain had its “own approach” but did not
say what that was. This caused exaspera-
tion in America, where an official ques-
tioned whether there was any point
imposing sanctions when the Kremlin’s
allies could just circumvent them in
Britain.
The US was also pressing ahead with
arming Ukraine. In 2018, the American
government began selling hundreds of
Javelin anti-tank missiles to the country
to deter further aggression by Russia.
Since the first invasion, Fallon had
been persistently lobbied for more arms
by Petro Poroshenko, then president of
Ukraine, during annual visits to Kyiv. But
Johnson was firmly behind his govern-
ment’s policy of withholding weapons.
“The UK is contributing to the efforts to
stave off Russian military meddling with
the non-lethal equipment that we have
agreed to send to Ukraine,” he said in a
July 2017 parliamentary debate. “With
British help, I believe that it is prevailing
and will prevail.”
This optimistic view was a direct con-
trast to the position taken by the Ameri-
cans, according to a source who was a
minister at the time. The US had decided
to supply anti-tank missiles “because the
Ukrainians were getting bogged down in
Donbas” and “weren’t getting rid of the
Russians”, the source said.
Another senior Conservative source
said his government had been “tiptoeing
around the Kremlin”. He believed that
Russia might have been dissuaded from
invading Ukraine a second time if Britain
had acceded to its request for weapons.
“It made Ukraine a much more attractive
target in their eyes because we weren’t

“eye-watering quantity of capability”. He
added: “Rather like a chronic contagious
disease, it will creep up on us, and our
ability to act will be markedly con-
strained — and we’ll be the losers of this
competition,” he said.
ASSASSINS IN SALISBURY
By March 2018 Russia was continuing to
foment conflict among nationalists in
Donbas. In the same four-year period,
the Conservative Party had received
£1.5 million from donors linked to Russia.
May was reported to have wanted to
weaken this financial connection but, if
anything, her government was taking
even more cash from Russians who were
moving to Britain via the “golden visa”
scheme that allowed rich foreigners the
chance to buy the right to live in the UK.
The moment that might have changed
everything came on March 4 2018. It was
a cold but sunny afternoon when a man
and a younger woman were found foam-
ing at the mouth and falling in and out of
consciousness on a park bench in the
centre of Salisbury. They were identified
as Colonel Sergei Skripal, 66, a former
Russian military intelligence officer, and
his daughter Yulia, 33. Colonel Skripal
had been released in a spy swap with
Moscow eight years earlier.
The Skripals had both been poisoned
with the Russian nerve agent novichok
but doctors at Salisbury district hospital
managed to save their lives. Nick Bailey, a
detective sergeant with Wiltshire police,
was also poisoned and survived.
The two Russian assassins — Anatoly
Chepiga, a highly decorated military col-
onel, and Alexander Mishkin, a doctor in
the Russian intelligence service — dis-
carded a perfume bottle containing the
novichok, which killed Dawn Sturgess,
four months later. The police revealed
that there was enough nerve agent inside
the bottle to kill thousands of people.
Britain had little doubt that the Krem-
lin was behind the attacks and May
expelled 23 Russian diplomats. The
Kremlin responded in kind. It threw out
more than 100 British and international
officials, and labelled May “insane” for
blaming Russia. Little other punishment
was imposed on the Kremlin by Britain,
apart from token gestures such as John-
son withdrawing his invitation to Lavrov
for a return meeting in London and the
royal family boycotting the World Cup
finals in Russia.
After the Salisbury attack the govern-
ment took no action to crack down on
Putin’s oligarchs in London, but on the
other side of the Atlantic, Donald Trump
imposed sanctions on seven oligarchs
close to Putin. “Russian oligarchs and
elites who profit from this corrupt system
will no longer be insulated from the con-
sequences of their government’s desta-
bilising activities,” Steven Mnuchin, the
US Treasury secretary, warned.
Among them was the Putin associate
Oleg Deripaska, a billionaire with a multi-

beware, we also want to engage, which is
why in the coming months the foreign
secretary will be visiting Moscow.”
Two days before the long-awaited first
meeting in Moscow, on December 20,
2017, the former Conservative minister
John Whittingdale secured a debate in
parliament to raise his concerns about
what he had witnessed during a trip to
Donbas as chairman of the all-party par-
liamentary group for Ukraine.
He had visited a coke-producing plant
in the city of Avdiivka that had been dam-
aged by Russian shelling and a military
hospital in Dnipro treating wounded sol-
diers. At the time, Putin-backed forces
held control of about a fifth of Ukraine’s
sovereign territory yet Britain was still
seeking a diplomatic solution after three
years of unproductive talks.
On a separate visit to the city of Mariu-
pol,Whittingdale was told that arms were
needed because there was “a very strong
chance” of a further Russian military
advance. The commander of Ukrainian
forces presciently predicted the port city
would be “first in line” in the attack.
In the debate, which was attended by
two dozen MPs, Whittingdale suggested
that failing to adequately support
Ukraine in its resistance to the Russian
incursion would prove reminiscent of
the ill-fated deal in which Neville Cham-
berlain allowed Nazi Germany to annex
large parts of Czechoslovakia in 1938.
“Some might draw a comparison to
what Chamberlain said about Czechoslo-
vakia, that it is a ‘far away country’ about
which we know little. If they do, they
make the same mistake Chamberlain
made,” he said. “Ukraine matters to us. It
is a country in mainland Europe whose
territory has been violated by an aggres-
sive neighbour, and is on the front line of
what is becoming a new Cold War.”


BENTLEYS AND CRISPS
Three days before Christmas 2017, John-
son became the first minister to visit Mos-
cow for five years. In the press confer-
ence afterwards, he sat uncomfortably
with Lavrov and dutifully cited a list of
“difficulties” over Ukraine and cyber-
attacks that Britain could not ignore.
However, he was still optimistic that
Britain could do business with Russia.
The country presented a large and
untapped export market for British
goods now that the UK was to depart the
EU. “I am delighted to say that there are
increasing exports of British Kettle crisps
to Russia and in spite of all the difficulties
I believe 300 Bentleys were sold this year
in Russia,” Johnson enthused.
The failure to take Russia seriously
was beginning to frustrate the army’s top
brass. Four weeks after the Moscow
meeting, General Sir Nick Carter, chief of
the general staff, described Russia as the
biggest threat to the UK which “could ini-
tiate hostilities sooner than we expect”.
Carter warned that Russia was building
an increasingly aggressive army with an


I MADE
THE MISTAKE
OF THINKING
IT WAS
POSSIBLE
TO HAVE A
RESET WITH
RUSSIA. THAT
WAS A FOOL’S
ERRAND
Boris Johnson

home. This increases the chance of a real
catastrophe because eventually he will
push too far.” The committee’s findings
were published in a report entitled “Mos-
cow’s Gold: Russian Corruption in the
UK” in May 2018. The MPs said the failure
by the government to crack down on the
oligarchs’ corrupt money was endanger-
ing national security and undermining
efforts to build a global response to the
Salisbury attack.
The report called upon the govern-
ment to identify and sanction individuals
in the UK connected with the Kremlin.
The aim was to treat people who facili-
tated Putin’s work as if they were part of
the regime, according to Bob Seely, a
Conservative MP on the committee. “We
believed action should have been taken
against them,” he said.
‘IT’S NOT GOOD FOR THE CITY’
The responsibility for implementing and
monitoring the progress of this new
approach to sanctions would have fallen
to Johnson’s Foreign Office. But the
department was reluctant to accept the
MPs’ recommendations. It said the Sanc-
tions and Anti-Money Laundering Act —
which was introduced that summer in
preparation for Britain’s exit from the EU
— would give it powers to sanction indi-
viduals if necessary. A register of owner-
ship for overseas companies that had
acquired property in the UK was also
being set up to prevent criminals hiding
their wealth, the Foreign Office added.
However, the new act would not be
used for another two years and even then
it was not directed against any London-
based oligarchs. The property register
has still not been made available to the
public. The lack of any concrete action
infuriated many of the MPs on the com-
mittee. “We’ve been consistently moan-
ing about it ever since,” Chris Bryant, a
Labour member, said.
A cabinet minister from that period
recalls that the government was treading
gently around the oligarchs. “It would
have needed Treasury approval [to go
after the oligarchs]... the thinking was
that it’s not very good for the City,” the
former minister said.
A former senior figure in the Foreign
Office believes that the oligarchs’ connec-
tions, money and even popularity made
them difficult targets for government
action. “If you have a lot of money, and
you buy a football team or a newspaper,
you can help yourself in a way that nor-
mal individuals cannot... you have
extra protection and extra access,” he
said. He gave Roman Abramovich, the
owner of Chelsea football club, as an
example: “He [Abramovich] is very pop-
ular in parts of London. And politicians
are sensitive to that popularity.”
There may have even been a personal
reason for the Foreign Office’s failure to
get behind the report. The source said
there was a “very poor relationship”

arming them. And we looked like we had
no political will to stand up to Russia or
indeed to help Ukraine,” he said.
The Salisbury attack prompted a
renewed media focus on the Conserva-
tive Party’s links to wealthy Russians who
were among its funders. That year, 2018,
the party received £700,000 in Russian-
linked donations, the highest sum so far.
Russia was also coming under
increased scrutiny from parliament. An
investigation into the threat posed by the
Kremlin had begun in November 2017 by
the intelligence and security committee.
Part of its remit was to look into allega-
tions of Russian interference in British
politics, including the Brexit and Scottish
independence referendums. “The Rus-
sians want Brexit because they are very
keen to break down the cohesion of west-
ern Europe,” the committee’s chairman,
Dominic Grieve, a Remain supporter,
said at the start of its inquiry.
The foreign affairs committee also
embarked on a shorter and more tar-
geted inquiry in response to the Skripal
attacks. This was to focus on measures to
counter Putin by stopping his Russian
allies from hiding their assets in London.
OFFSHORE HAVENS
One of its first witnesses in late March
2018 was Johnson. He claimed that
“nobody would be happier than me” to
“finger the collar” of “corrupt oligarchs
and distrain them of their possessions in
London”. But he added that he was reluc-
tant to “start a great hue and cry against
certain individuals who might actually
have wealth that was perfectly proper”.
Even the Russian embassy could see
there was a problem — while not acknowl-
edging its own citizens’ involvement. It
wrote in a submission to the committee:
“The willingness of the UK to provide a
‘safe haven’ to criminal money from
around the world has been consistently
criticised by Russia.”
A series of other witnesses to the com-
mittee described the mechanism by
which illicit funds were transferred from
Russia to secretive British offshore
havens and then were used to buy man-
sions in London, shares in companies
and expensive yachts.
The Russian-born anti-corruption
campaigner Roman Borisovich argued
that all the oligarchs had one thing in
common. “They are not self-made busi-
nessmen in the American sense. Every
one of them made money through a rela-
tionship with the Russian government,”
he told the committee. “That bond forces
them to do all sorts of chores for Putin.”
Among the witnesses was Garry Kas-
parov, the chess grandmaster, who
pointed out the cost of appeasing Putin.
“Despite having massive military supe-
riority, the free world has refused to
stand up to Russian aggression, to call
Putin’s bluff,” he said. “This has given
him more and more confidence and
increased his aura of invincibility at

IT WAS NOT
EASY
REACHING OUT
TO DOMINIC
RAAB. I
UNDERSTAND
YOUR
SECRETARIES
ARE BUSY
PEOPLE
Vadym Prystaiko,
Ukraine’s
ambassador to
London
Continued on page 20→

INSIGHT
TEAM
George
Arbuthnott and
Jonathan Calvert

Chamberlain allowing Nazi
Germany to annex parts of
Czechoslovakia in 1938.


December 2017
Johnson becomes the first
minister to visit Moscow for
five years. He lists
“difficulties” over Ukraine
and cyberattacks which
Britain cannot ignore, but
adds: “I am delighted to say
that there are increasing
exports of British Kettle
crisps to Russia and in spite
of all the difficulties I believe
300 Bentleys were sold this
year in Russia.”


January 2018
General Sir Nick Carter, the
chief of the general staff,


British government’s policy
of withholding weapons.
A senior Conservative
source says the UK
“didn’t want to upset the
Russians”.
March 2018
Johnson tells the Commons
intelligence and security
committee that “nobody
would be happier than me”
to “finger the collar” of
“corrupt oligarchs” but
refuses to “start a great hue
and cry against...
individuals who might
actually have wealth that was
perfectly proper”. Garry
Kasparov, the renowned
chess grandmaster, warns
the committee that “the free

agent to kill thousands of
people. There seems little
doubt that the Russian state
is behind the attacks. In
response, Theresa May
expels 23 Russian diplomats.
The Kremlin denies
responsibility.
March 2018
Johnson withdraws his
invitation to Lavrov for a
return meeting in London
and the royal family say they
will boycott the World Cup
finals in Russia.
2018
The American government
begins selling anti-tank
missiles to Ukraine. But
Johnson has reaffirmed the

gives a keynote speech
describing Russia as the
biggest threat to the UK —
adding that Putin “could
initiate hostilities sooner than
we expect”.
March 2018
Sergei Skripal, a former
Russian military intelligence
officer, and his 33-year-old
daughter Yulia are found
foaming at the mouth on a
park bench in the centre of
Salisbury. They have been
poisoned with novichok. The
discarded perfume bottle
with the deadly nerve agent
in it will later kill Dawn
Sturgess, a mother of three
children. The bottle had
contained enough nerve

Russia invaded
Crimea in 2014
and carried out a
poison attack in
Britain in 2018, the
year that Vladimir
Putin played host
to the World Cup
in Moscow

world has refused to stand
up to Russian aggression, to
call Putin’s bluff... this has
given him more and more
confidence”.
May 2018
The committee’s findings are
published. It warns that
Putin’s cronies have hidden
corrupt assets in London and
the Kremlin is able to call
upon these resources to
further its aggressive foreign
policy. It highlights the lack
of action by successive
governments over corrupt
Russian money in London,
which it says is endangering
national security. The
government takes little
concrete action. A cabinet

minister recalls that “the
thinking was that it’s not very
good for the City” to pursue
Russian oligarchs.
September 2018
Johnson admits that his
“thinking it was possible to
have a reset with Russia” and
“wanting to engage with
Putin and Sergey Lavrov” has
been a “classic mistake” and
a “fool’s errand”.
July 2019
Johnson is elected prime
minister.
October 2019
A report on Russia by the
Commons foreign affairs
Continued on page 20→
Free download pdf