The Washington Post - USA (2022-04-25)

(Antfer) #1

B2 EZ RE THE WASHINGTON POST.MONDAY, APRIL 25 , 2022


education

districts have the most data on
possible inside candidates and
are better able to preserve their
culture if they promote them.
The preference for outside
candidates hurts morale, he said,
because “you can never get to the
top unless you move to a new
place.”
Scott Brabrand understands
how that works. He is the Fairfax
County schools superintendent
whose decision to leave at the
end of his contract June 30 led to
the appointment of Reid. He
started in the district as a social
studies teacher in 1994 and had
several jobs there as an
administrator. I met him then.
He was smart and energetic. But
he wasn’t appointed Fairfax
schools superintendent until
2017, after he had served five
years as head of Lynchburg City
Schools in Virginia.
He may have tried to tell
school board members of the
people they already had who
would make great leaders. But if
he did, the board members sadly
weren’t convinced that a
candidate who knows their
county would be better than one
who doesn’t.

a new schools chancellor. I
begged her first to have a long
conversation with the retiring
chancellor, Kaya Henderson, over
what person already working in
the district would make a good
replacement. Henderson had
been the rare case of an inside
appointment. She became one of
the longest serving leaders in the
district’s history. She knew who
would be ready to run those
schools, full of challenges.
The mayor, as I expected, still
picked an outside candidate. I
suspect she feared doing
otherwise would have seemed
gauche. So many people around
her, as happens with most big
districts, assumed a national
search was the smart move.
The most successful public
charter school systems usually
don’t do that. They know what
works for their kids. They
appoint leaders from inside their
systems who understand their
methods and know how to make
even more progress.
Doug Lemov, the best-selling
author of the “Teach Like a
Champion” books and a leader in
the Uncommon Schools charter
network, noted that school

detailed commentary on the
hiring decision in The
Washington Post last week titled
“We walked out over Fairfax
County’s new superintendent.
Here’s why.”
Those students, and others
with doubts about Reid, could
not have made the argument that
the new hire doesn’t understand
the district if the school board
had promoted to superintendent
one of the many excellent Fairfax
County administrators who have
made the district so popular with
families moving into the area.
People like Reid, shining stars
from distant places, look great on
paper. But they arrive lacking
allies. Some of the most
successful administrators in a
district are likely to resent their
presence, particularly if they
celebrate their arrival with a
barrage of new ideas. Sometimes
in such situations, schools are
forced to kill programs that a
savvy inside candidate would
have known were just beginning
to work.
In 2016, I wrote a column in
the form of a letter to D.C. Mayor
Muriel E. Bowser. She was about
to exercise her power to appoint

the Year by AASA. The
announcement said she was
“known regionally and nationally
for instructional leadership and
crafting sustainable systems for
district support of the
instructional core.”
That’s wonderful. But it
doesn’t change the fact that she
doesn’t know much about Fairfax
County. And as an outsider, she is
a perfect target for unhappy
county residents who have been
at war with the district on issues
such as teaching about race and
admissions to the country’s most
selective public high school.
As my colleague Hannah
Natanson reported recently, Reid
is opposed by the county NAACP
chapter, many parent groups and
students. Several young people at
Mount Vernon High School
walked out of classes to protest
the new superintendent and how
she was selected.
Jaya Nachnani, an 18-year-old
senior at Mount Vernon, told
Natanson: “We want to know if
she’d be prepared for such a
diverse and big county, because,
you know, it’s a totally different
ballgame.” Nachnani is one of
four students who wrote a

going outside can be the wrong
move. But since about two-thirds
of superintendent hires are
outsiders, the headhunters know
it’s bad for business to say that in
public.
U.S. school districts such as
the 180,000-student Fairfax
County system worship the myth
that outside candidates whom
they do not know have to be
smarter than the people who
already work for them. They do
nationwide searches for the same
reason rich people buy enormous
mansions with far more living
space than they need. They
would be thought strange if they
didn’t.
This problem has new
importance, because the turmoil
caused by the pandemic has led
to a big jump in superintendent
turnover, from about 15 percent
annually to 25 percent, according
to AASA, the School
Superintendents Association.
The Fairfax County School
Board just named Michelle Reid
as its new superintendent. As
head of the much smaller
Northshore School District in
Bothell, Wash., she was declared
2021 National Superintendent of

Even some of the
best school boards
experience an
uncomfortable
moment when
they appoint an
outside candidate
as a
superintendent
thinking that will solve their
problems but find that isn’t so.
The best new example is the
trouble in which the Fairfax
County School Board finds itself.
Like many other school boards, it
couldn’t resist hiring an
attractive outsider, but as a
consequence, parents, students
and other important folk are in
revolt.
These two key words are the
source of the problem: national
search. When school board
members, and the public
relations professionals who write
their news releases, need a new
superintendent, they cannot
stifle the urge to say they are
launching a national search, or
words to that effect.
What they actually do is hire
headhunting firms. Those
executive recruiters are smart
people who understand why


School districts, stop hiring splendid outsiders to be your superintendents


Jay
Mathews


BY STEVEN YODER


Jodie Parks works full time as an
occupational therapist at a Michi-
gan state psychiatric hospital. But
since October, she has had a sec-
ond job: spending four hours a
week, she estimates, making calls
and chasing down paperwork to
prove that she previously served in
the military.
She needs that proof to have her
student loans forgiven under the
federal government’s Public Serv-
ice Loan Forgiveness program,
created by a 2007 law that pledged
to erase students’ debt if they took
lower-paying but critical jobs with
nonprofits and the government.
It’s a promise that, for most
borrowers, has yet to pay off. Fewer
than 2 percent of applicants were


approved between 2017, when the
first borrowers became eligible,
and the onset of the coronavirus
pandemic. And among the huge
number of applications denied or
lost in the bureaucracy were many
from Americans who perform per-
haps the ultimate public service:
joining the armed forces.
“I’m another veteran who’s been
told that there’s a service for veter-
ans, and then when you try to get
through the red tape, it’s too hard,”
said Parks, who was in the Air
Force from 2009 to 2015 and then
earned a degree in occupational
therapy. “So you just kind of give
up.”
Ninety-two percent of military
borrowers who applied for loan
forgiveness before the pandemic
were denied by the Education De-

partment, according to the U.S.
Government Accountability Of-
fice, because of confusing and nar-
row rules about eligible loan types
and repayment plans that made it
difficult for them to qualify.
“The law made a promise to
people that if they went into public
service jobs, they would have their
loans forgiven. And a lot of people
went to school on that basis,” said
Christopher Madaio, vice presi-
dent for legal affairs at Veterans
Education Success, which advo-
cates for military members.
In October, the Biden adminis-
tration temporarily loosened the
program’s rules for one year to give
more borrowers the chance to
qualify. Waived are many of the
strict guidelines that stymied ap-
plicants. That has helped more

members of the military with stu-
dent debt: About 1,500 have had
their loans forgiven under the
waiver since October, a spokesper-
son for the Education Department
said in an email.
But there are almost 177,000
active-duty service members
whose federal loans are or could be
eligible for forgiveness, according
to the GAO. And that larger num-
ber doesn’t include the thousands,
like Parks, who are no longer on
active duty. She and other veterans
said they’ve spent months trapped
in a bureaucratic maze that may
make it harder for them than for
nonmilitary borrowers to get for-
giveness.
Thousands of dollars are in play.
About half the active-duty service
members who have federal stu-
dent loans have balances of more
than $13,000, according to the
GAO.
A lot is at stake for the armed
forces, too. In an all-volunteer sys-
tem, it has a tough time finding
people to fill mission-critical jobs,
including doctors and informa-
tion technology specialists, for
whom the forgiveness program
could be an effective recruitment
tool, the GAO noted. In a survey of
military lawyers, 94 percent said
they would be more likely to quit
the service if the program were
eliminated.
For Parks and other veterans,
the biggest hurdle in getting loan
forgiveness has been proving to
the Education Department that
they served — an odd problem,
since a fellow federal agency, the
Defense Department, has that in-
formation.
Parks, 39, has about $48,000 in
student loans, and when she heard
about the temporary waiver in Oc-
tober, she got to work assembling
her forgiveness application. A key
piece of it is a form that applicants
must get signed by current or for-
mer employers — government
agencies or nonprofits — certify-
ing the dates that forgiveness ap-
plicants worked there.
For Parks, getting that employ-
ment certification form signed by
the state of Michigan, her current
employer, couldn’t have been easi-
er.
She thought it would be the
same with the Air Force. Instead,
she spent weeks making calls to
find out who in the bureaucracy
might sign. Finally given the num-
ber of a person she was told could
do it, she tried him every day for a
month and never heard back.
Next, she contacted Veterans Af-
fairs, getting rerouted repeatedly
until she reached an official who
leveled with her: It would be near-
ly impossible to get a signature out
of VA because it didn’t have anyone
designated to provide one. He sug-
gested she go to a military base and
ask someone there to sign the
form, or contact a commander she
knew. But most of her command-
ers had retired in the six years
since she had served.
All this would have been avoid-
ed had her loan servicer, an Educa-
tion Department contractor called
FedLoan Servicing, accepted as
proof a standard official document
veterans get when they leave the
military: their certificate of release
or discharge, better known as DD
Form 214. It shows veterans’ dates
of service and is used as proof for
benefits including VA home loans.
But, Parks said, FedLoan told
her it wasn’t enough.
Other veterans and service
members have experienced simi-

lar frustrations.
To qualify for Public Service
Loan Forgiveness, a person has to
not only work full time at a public
agency or nonprofit but also make
120 payments on their loans —
typically over 10 years. Navy vet-
eran Stacy Hunter, 46, submitted
her DD 214 with her forgiveness
application in October but was
told in a letter from FedLoan and
the Education Department that
her seven years of service, during
which her loan payments were de-
ferred, didn’t count toward her 120
payments.
That’s despite the department’s
announcement in October that
months spent on active duty count
toward PSLF even if the service
member’s loan payments were in
deferment.
Mike Smiley, 42, also spent
many hours getting military sign-
off for, and seeking answers about,
the loan forgiveness he believed he
had earned. He served 14 years in
the Navy as a doctor. Today he’s a
pediatric pulmonologist in St.
Louis. With $50,000 owed in stu-
dent loans and four children, he
would be hugely helped by getting
out from under that debt, he said.
FedLoan wouldn’t accept his
DD 214 and even rejected a letter
from the Navy’s personnel com-
mand verifying his service, Smiley
said. But former Navy co-workers
connected him with the human
resources department at his old
command, and the department
signed his employment form. He
submitted his forgiveness applica-
tion in December.
After hearing nothing for sev-
eral weeks, Smiley submitted a
complaint to the Education De-
partment and later went to the
department’s ombudsman. He
started calling FedLoan every two
to three weeks, spending at least
an hour on hold over his lunch
break. On one call in early March,
he found out that his application
was stuck because he had saved it
as a PDF file.
Finally, on March 22, his loan
forgiveness was approved.
“I really wish they would come
up with a process to take care of
people, not just myself, but other
people who are in my shoes who
maybe aren’t as persistent,” he

said.
After the waiver announcement
in October, the number of forgive-
ness applications spiked by 40 per-
cent, said an Education Depart-
ment spokesperson who spoke on
the condition of anonymity be-
cause she wasn’t authorized to
speak on behalf of the department
on this topic. “The loan servicer
system had not quite been recon-
figured to be able to send the kind
of automated communications
that align with the terms of the
waiver and the benefits that were
being offered.... This is not a
perfect process,” she said.
If a forgiveness application is
otherwise in order, the spokesper-
son said, the DD 214 “generally
suffices” to prove military service.
Asked in what cases it wouldn’t be
enough, she said she didn’t know.
As for FedLoan, spokesperson
Keith New said by email that DD
214 forms are acceptable if submit-
ted with other information and
“reviewed on a case-by-case basis.”
Madaio of Veterans Education
Success gives the Biden adminis-
tration credit for using its authori-
ty to temporarily waive the pro-
gram’s narrow rules, a step for
which military borrower advo-
cates had been calling. “The ad-
ministration is trying as hard as it
can,” Madaio said.
The Education Department is
now working with the Defense De-
partment to automatically match
data across the two agencies, said a
department spokesperson —
which could end borrowers’ strug-
gle to get signatures. And it’s col-
laborating with advocates on per-
manent regulations that could
help more borrowers qualify after
the waiver expires in October.
For her part, Parks feels lucky
that her work schedule makes it
possible to keep on top of her
forgiveness application.
“If I wasn’t at a job with an
afternoon shift, there’s no way that
I would have gotten any of this
done,” she said.

This article about military veterans
and student loans was produced by
the Hechinger Report, a nonprofit,
independent news organization
focused on inequality and innovation
in education.

Veterans seeking loan forgiveness still mired in red tape


COURTESY OF MIKE SMILEY
Navy veteran and pediatric pulmonologist Mike Smiley spent
months seeking answers about his l oan forgiveness application.

WE BRING THE SHOWROOM TO YOU!

*Off er valid on 3 Day Blinds brand products only, excluding shutters and special orders. Buy 1 qualifying window covering and
receive the 2nd qualifying window covering of equal or lesser value at 50% off! Off er excludes installation, sales tax, shipping and
handling. Not valid on previous purchases or with any other off er or discount. Off er Code BGXB. Expires 04/30/22. State Contractor
and Home Improvement Licenses: Arizona 321056. California 1005 986. Connecticut HIC. 0644 950. New Jersey 13VH09390200.
Oregon 209181. Pennsylvania PA107656. Te nnessee 100 20. Washington 3DAYBDB842KS. County Licenses: Nassau County,
NY H01073101. Rockland County, NY H-12401-34-00-00. Licensed through Great Windows Services, LLC: Virginia 270517 2678.
West Virginia WV061238. Various City Licenses Available Upon Request. © 2022 3 Day Blinds LLC.

Call To Schedule

or visitwww.3DayOff er657.com

1-855-754-7025

Custom Blinds, Shades,
Shutters & Drapery

HURRY!LimitedTimeOffer
!

on Custom Blinds,
Shades & Drapery

Buy 1 Get 1

5050
OFF

%

OFF

%

*

In-Home Design
Consultation

FREEFREE

PLUS

Ask us what we are doing to keep you safe.

Personalized Experience | Fast Service | Trusted Brand

WeDESIGN,WeMEASURE,WeINSTALL,You RELAX!®

Call
Today &
SAVE!

SAVINGS
You’ll Love!

Motorized ShaMotorized Shades Ades Availablevailable

1-888-981-6 945
http://www.3DayOffer410.com

*Offer valid on 3 Day Blinds brand products only, excluding shutters and special orders. Buy 1 qualifying window covering and
receive the 2nd qualifying window covering of equal or lesser value at 50% off! Offer excludes installation, sales tax, shipping
and handling. Not valid on previous purchases or with any other offer or discount. Offer Code MC19622. Expires 04/30/22.
State Contractor and Home Improvement Licenses: Arizona 321056. California 1005 986. Connecticut HIC. 0644 950. New Jersey
13VH09390200. Oregon 209181. Pennsylvania PA107656. Te nnessee 100 20. Washington 3DAY BDB842KS. County Licenses:
Nassau County, NY H01073101. Rockland County, NY H-12401-34-00-00. Licensed through Great Windows Services, LLC: Virginia
270517 2678. West Virginia WV061238. Various City Licenses Available Upon Request. © 2022 3 Day Blinds LLC.
Free download pdf