114 Shank
man,” in José Chabás and Bernard R. Goldstein, Archimedes, eds., The Alfonsine Tables
of Toledo (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003), 8: 136, 141–43.- Lynn Thorndike, “Query no. 14,” Isis 14 (1930): 421; Pierre Duhem, Le système
du monde: Histoire des doctrines cosmologiques de Platon à Copernic (Paris: Hermann,
1913–59), 4:16–17; Lejbowicz, “Les disciplines du quadrivium: l’astronomie,” 195–211,
esp. 209–11; Beaujouan, “Le quadrivium et la Faculté des arts,” 194. - Bernard Goldstein, “Theory and Observation in Medieval Astronomy,” Isis 63
(1972): 39–47, esp. 47; Goldstein, The Astronomy of Levi ben Gerson (1288–1344) (New
York: Springer Verlag, 1985),7–8, 13–14; Goldstein, “Before the Sun in the Church,”
Journal for the History of Astronomy 32 (2001): 73–77; and Jacquart, “L’observation dans
les sciences de la nature au moyen âge,” 57–59. - Noel M. Swerdlow, “Regiomontanus on the Critical Problems of Astronomy,”
in Nature, Experiment and the Sciences, ed. Trevor Levere and William Shea (Boston:
Kluwer, 1990), 165–95, esp. 173. - William R. Newman, “Art, Nature, and Experiment among Some Aristotelian
Alchemists,” in Sylla and McVaugh, Texts and Contexts in Ancient and Medieval Science,
305–17, esp. on 305–12; Newman, “The Place of Alchemy in the Current Literature
on Experiment,” in Experimental Essays—Versuch zum Experiment, ed. Michael Heidel-
berger and Friedrich Steinle (Baden- Baden: Nomos Gesellschaft, 1998), 9–33, esp.
23–25; Newman, “The Medieval Tradition of Alchemical Corpuscular Theory” (23–44),
and “Erastus and the Critique of Chemical Analysis” (45–64) in Atoms and Alchemy:
Chymistry and the Experimental Origins of the Scientifi c Revolution (Chicago: University of
Chicago Press, 2006). - Sabetai Unguru, “Experiment in Medieval Optics,” in Physics, Cosmology, and
Astronomy, 1300–1700: Tension and Accommodation, ed. Sabetai Unguru (Dordrecht: D.
Reidel: 1991), 163–81; Danielle Jacquard, “L’observation dans les sciences de la nature
au moyen âge,” esp. 75; Guy Beaujouan, “La prise de conscience de l’aptitude à innover
(le tournant du milieu du XIIIe siècle),” in Ribémont, Le moyen âge et la science, 5–14,
esp. on 8. - Katharine Park, Secrets of Women: Gender, Generation, and the Origins of Human
Disssection (Cambridge, MA: Zone Books, 2006). - William J. Courtenay, “The Arts Faculty at Paris in 1329,” in Weijers and
Holtz, L’enseignement des disciplines, 55–69, esp. 62. - John Marenbon, “The Theoretical and Practical Autonomy of Philosophy as
a Discipline in the Middle Ages: Latin Philosophy, 1250–1350,” in Knowledge and the
Sciences in Medieval Philosophy, vol. 1, ed. Monika Asztalos, John E. Murdoch, and Ilkka
Niiniluoto (Helsinki,(s.n., 1990), 262–74. - Grant, “The Relations between Natural Philosophy and Theology,” in A His-
tory of Natural Philosophy, 239–73. - Alain de Libéra, “Faculté des arts ou faculté de philosophie?,” 440–44.
- Paul Czartoryski, “La notion d’université et l’idée de science,” 29.
- Verger, “The First French Universities,” esp. 10–11, 14–15; John Baldwin,
“Theology, the Queen of the Faculties,” in The Scholastic Culture of the Middle Ages,
1000–1300 (Lexington, MA: Heath, 1971), 79–97. - W. D. Ross, ed., Aristotle’s Metaphysics (1924; Oxford: Oxford University Press,
1966), 1:350–51; Jonathan Barnes, ed., The Complete Works of Aristotle (Princeton,