170 Dear
- See bibliographical discussion in Robert Lenoble, Mersenne ou la naissance du
mécanisme (Paris: J. Vrin, 1943), xxix–xxx. - Carla Rita Palmerino, “Infi nite Degrees of Speed: Marin Mersenne and the De-
bate over Galileo’s Law of Free Fall,” Early Science and Medicine 4 (1999): 269–328. - Dear, Discipline and Experience, 172–73.
- Ibid., 178.
- See Peter R. Anstey, “Experimental Versus Speculative Natural Philosophy,”
in The Science of Nature in the Seventeenth Century: Patterns of Change in Early Modern
Natural Philosophy, ed. Peter R. Anstey and John A. Schuster (Dordrecht: Springer,
2005), 215–42, esp. 232–36; Alan E. Shapiro, “Newton’s ‘Experimental Philosophy’,”
Early Science and Medicine 9 (2004): 185–217. Cf. Rob Iliffe, “Abstract Considerations:
Disciplines and the Incoherence of Newton’s Natural Philosophy,” Studies in History and
Philosophy of Science 35 (2004): 427–54. - Isaac Newton, The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy: A
New Translation and Guide, trans. by I. Bernard Cohen and Anne Whitman (Berkeley:
University of California Press, 1999), 379; Halley’s Latin is “opus... mathematico-
physicum”: Isaac Newton, Isaac Newton’s Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica,
ed. Alexandre Koyré and I. Bernard Cohen, based on the 1726 ed. (Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press, 1972), 1:12. - Barbara J. Shapiro, John Wilkins, 1614–1672: An Intellectual Biography (Berkeley:
University of California Press, 1969), 192. - Jean Le Rond d’Alembert, “Observations on Bacon’s Division of the Sciences”
(1751), in Preliminary Discourse to the Encyclopedia of Diderot, trans. by Richard N.
Schwab (Indianapolis: Bobbs- Merrill, 1963), 159. - Alexandre Koyré, “Huygens and Leibniz on Universal Attraction,” in Newtonian
Studies (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1965), 115–38; Roberto De A. Martins,
“Huygens’s Reaction to Newton’s Gravitational Theory,” in Renaissance and Revolution:
Humanists, Scholars, Craftsmen and Natural Philosophers in Early Modern Europe, ed. J. V.
Field and Frank A. J. L. James (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 203–13. - Newton, Principia, 381. Cf. Niccolò Guicciardini, “Newton: Between Tradi-
tion and Innovation,” in Reading the Principia: The Debate on Newton’s Mathematical
Methods for Natural Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 99–117;
Mordechai Feingold, “Mathematicians and Naturalists: Sir Isaac Newton and the Royal
Society,” in Isaac Newton’s Natural Philosophy, ed. Jed Z. Buchwald and I. Bernard Cohen
(Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001), 77–102. - Newton, Principia, 392.
- See, e.g., Aristotle Posterior Analytics I.3.
- D’Alembert, “Observations on Bacon’s Division of the Sciences.”
- Alan Gabbey, “The Mechanical Philosophy and Its Problems: Mechanical
Explanations, Impenetrability, and Perpetual Motion,” in Change and Progress in Modern
Science, ed. Joseph C. Pitt (Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1985), 9–84; Gabbey, “Newton, Active
Powers, and the Mechanical Philosophy,” in The Cambridge Companion to Newton, I.
Bernard Cohen and George E. Smith (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002),
329–57. - Philosophical Transactions #80 (1672), 3085; A. Rupert Hall, “Beyond the Fringe:
Diffraction as Seen by Grimaldi, Fabri, Hooke and Newton,” Notes and Records of the