Science, Pseudoscience, and Science Falsely So- Called 303- Slotten, Patronage, Practice, and the Culture of American Science, 29.
- Reese, Humbugs of New- York, 111; Holmes, “The Professor at the Breakfast- Table.”
- John K. Kane to Joseph Henry, November 20, 1843, in The Papers of Joseph
 Henry (Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1992), 5:451; Joseph Henry to
 Alexander Dallas Bache, April 16, 1844, ibid., 6:76–77.
- George M Sternberg, “Science and Pseudo- Science in Medicine,” Science 5
 (1897): 199–206. See also J. B. Stallo, “Speculative Science,” Popular Science Monthly 21
 (1882): 145–64.
- Daniel G. Brinton, “The Character and Aims of Scientifi c Investigation,” Sci-
 ence 1 (1895): 3–4; C. F. Nichols, “Divine Healing,” Science 19 (1892): 43–44; William
 Leon Brown, Christian Science Falsely So Called (New York: Fleming H. Revell, 1911);
 “Separation of the Tares and the Wheat,” Christian Science Journal 6 (1889): 546 (pseudo
 scientists). See also Rennie B. Schoepfl in, “Separating ‘True’ Scientists from ‘Pseudo’
 Scientists,” in Christian Science on Trial: Religious Healing in America (Baltimore, MD: The
 Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003), 82–109.
- Augustine F. Hewitt, “The Warfare of Science,” Catholic World 911(1891): 679;
 Daniel G. Brinton, Myths of the New World: A Treatise on the Symbolism and Mythology
 of the Red Race of America (New York: Henry Holt, 1876), 298; J. H. M’Clelland, The
 Mind: The Annual Address Delivered before the Homeopathic Medical Society of Pennsylvania
 (Pittsburgh: Wm. G. Johnston, 1876), 22; “Character in Finger Nails,” New York Times,
 December 5, 1884.
- “The Old and New Phrenology,” The Open Court 1 (1887): 435.
- See Frank M. Turner, “The Victorian Confl ict between Science and Religion: A
 Professional Dimension,” Isis 69 (1978): 356–76.
- B. E. Fernow, “Pseudo- Science in Meteorology,” Science 3 (1896): 706.
- “Character in Finger Nails,” New York Times, December 5, 1884.
- R. S. Woodward, “Address of the President,” Science 12 (1900): 14.
- “Time Wasted,” Science 6 (1897): 969.
- E. F. Carr, “A Theory, an Extravaganza,” Ladies’ Repository 12 (1873): 125.
- Joseph LeConte, “Rough Notes of a Yosemite Camping Trip—III,” Overland
 Monthly, 2nd ser. 6 (1885): 636.
- Sternberg, “Science and Pseudo- Science in Medicine,” 202.
- Woodward, “Address of the President,” 14.
- W. H. Mallock, “Civilization and Equality,” Contemporary Review 40 (1881): 660;
 reprinted in Appletons’ Journal, new ser. 11 (1881): 526–38.
- Edward A. Ross, “Social Control,” American Journal of Sociology 1 (1896):
 513–35, on 513 and 530; Albion W. Small, “The Scope of Sociology,” American Journal
 of Sociology 6 (1900): 42–66, on 59; Review of Mathematical Economics by Wilhelm
 Launhardt, Science 1 (1886): 309.
- See Thomas Henry Huxley, “Scientifi c and Pseudo- Scientifi c Realism,” Nine-
 teenth Century 21 (1887) 191–204, repr. in Popular Science Monthly 30 (1887): 789–803;
 Thomas Henry Huxley, “Science and Pseudo- Science,” Nineteenth Century 21 (1887):
 481–98, repr. in Popular Science Monthly 31(1887): 207–24, and in Eclectic Magazine,
 new. ser., 45 (1887): 721–31. For Campbell’s articles, see Duke of Argyll, “Professor
 Huxley on Cannon Liddon,” Nineteenth Century 21 (1887): 321–39; Duke of Argyll,
 “Science Falsely So Called,” 771–74.
