304 Thurs and Numbers
- “Socialism and Communism in ‘The Independent,’” Catholic World 28 (1879):
812–13. - Review of Inductive Inquiries in Philosophy, Ethics, and Ethnology, by A. H. Dana,
Presbyterian Quarterly and Princeton Review; “Darwin on Expressions,” Littell’s Living Age,
new. ser. 2, July 5, 1873,: 561 (pseudo- scientifi c skepticism). - Augustine F. Hewit, “Scriptural Questions,” Catholic World 44 (1887): 660–61.
- Frederick Tupper Jr., “Textual Criticism as Pseudo- Science,” PMLA 25 (1910): 176.
- A. B. MaCallum, “Scientifi c Truth and the Scientifi c Spirit,” Science 43 (1916):
444; Peter Frandsen, “Anti- Scientifi c Propaganda,” California and Western Medicine 25
(1926): 336. - Bronislaw Malinowski, Magic, Science and Religion (Garden City, NY: Doubleday,
1954), 87. - Albion W. Small, “The Subject- Matter of Sociology,” American Journal of Sociology
10 (1904): 281; John Dewey, The Public and Its Problems (New York: Henry Holt, 1927),
7; L. S. Hearnshaw, “A Reply to Professor Collingwood’s Attack on Psychology,” Mind 51
(1942): 165; Rose Macaulay, Keeping Up Appearances (London: W. Collins Sons, 1928), 213. - Edward Sapir, quoted in Leslie A. White, “Evolutionism in Cultural Anthro-
pology: A Rejoinder,” American Anthropologist 49 (1947): 407; Hugh Ross Wiliamson,
“Pseudo- Science,” National and English Review 139 (1952): 48. - Letter dated February 9, 1925, in The Correspondence of W. E. B. Du Bois, ed.
Herbert Aptheker (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1973–1978), 1: 303. - Wilton Marion Krogman, “Race Prejudice, Pseudo- Science and the Negro,”
Phylon 8 (1947): 14. - F. C. S. Schiller, “Are History and Science Different Kinds of Knowledge,” Mind,
new ser. 31 (1922): 462 (original emphasis). - Arthur Frank Payne, “The Scientifi c Selection of Men,” Scientifi c Monthly 11
(1920): 545. - “Irresponsible Pseudo- Science,” Bookman 81 (1932): 576; A. W. Meyer “Refl ec-
tions on Credulity,” Scientifi c Monthly 24 (1927): 530, 532; Frandsen, “Anti- Scientifi c
Propaganda,” 336. - Editor, “The Plague of Pseudo- Science,” Month 137 (1921): 531.
- Letter dated February 9, 1925, in Correspondence of W. E. B. Du Bois, 1:303.
- “Science in Romance,” Saturday Review 96 (1905): 414–15.
- See Mark Richard Siegel, Hugo Gernsback: Father of Modern Science Fiction (San
Bernadino, CA: Borgo Press, 1988). - Editor, “The Plague of Pseudo- Science,” 531; Frandsen, “Anti- Scientifi c Propa-
ganda,” 336. - Ronald L. Numbers, “Creationism Goes Global,” in The Creationists, 399–431.
- H. L. Mencken, “Nonsense as Science,” American Mercury 27 (1932): 509–10;
Peter Guthrie Tait, “Religion and Science,” in Life and Scientifi c Work of Peter Guthrie
Tait, ed. Cargill Gilston Knott (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1911), 293
(hydra- headed), an essay originally published in 1888. For a link between pseudo- and
anti- science, see, e.g., Frandsen, “Anti- Scientifi c Propaganda,” 336–38. - This was true of articles with “pseudoscience” in their titles as indexed by Read-
ers’ Guide and the Periodicals Contents Index (now Periodicals Index Online). These
searches were conducted in January 2003.