Science, Pseudoscience, and Science Falsely So- Called 305- C[arl] Sagan, “The Recognition of Extraterrestial Intelligence,” Proceedings of the
Royal Society of London B 189 (1975): 143. - Edward Condon, “UFOs I Have Loved and Lost,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
15 (December 1969): 6–8. - Samuel A. Miles, letter to the editor, Science 114 (1951): 554; Paul Kurz, “A
Quarter Century of Skeptical Inquiry: My Personal Involvement,” Skeptical Inquirer
25 (July / August): 42–47; Carl Sagan, “The Burden of Skepticism,” Skeptical Inquirer 12
(Fall 1987): 46. In 1974 Philip H. Abelson, editor of Science, had called attention to the
problem in “Pseudoscience,” Science 184 (1974): 1233. - “The State of Belief in the Paranormal Worldwide,” Skeptical Inquirer 8 (Spring
1984): 224–38; “International Committees,” Skeptical Inquirer 9 (Fall 1984): 97;
“Show- and- Tell Time Exposes Pseudo- Science,” People’s Daily Online, March 26, 2000,
http: // english.peopledaily .com.cn / english / 200003 / 26 / eng20000326N120 .html;
R. Ramachandran, “Degrees of Pseudo- Science,” Frontline 18 (March 31–April 13, 2001);
T. Jayaraman, “A Judicial Blow,” Frontline 18 (June 9–22, 2001). For a current list of
international organizations, see http: // www .csicop .org / resources / international
_organizations. - Carl Sagan, introduction to UFO’s—A Scientifi c Debate, ed. Carl Sagan and
Thornton Page (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1972), xiii. - Karl Popper, Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientifi c Knowledge
(London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963), 33 (original emphasis); Karl Popper, Logik der
Forschung (Vienna: Springer, 1934; published in English as The Logic of Scientifi c Discov-
ery [New York: Basic Books, 1959]). For other philosophical discussions of pseudosci-
ence, see R. G. Collingwood, An Essay on Metaphysics (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1940);
and Imre Lakatos, “Lecture One: The Demarcation Problem,” in Imre Lakatos and Paul
Feyerabend, For and Against Method, ed. Matteo Motterlini (Chicago: University of
Chicago Press, 1999), 20–31. - Numbers, The Creationists, 277–68; Larry Laudan, “The Demise of the Demarca-
tion Problem,” in Physics, Philosophy, and Psychoanalysis: Essays in Honor of Adolf Grün-
baum, ed. R. S. Cohen and Larry Laudan (Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel, 1983), 111–27,
repr. in But Is It Science? The Philosophical Question in the Creation / Evolution Controversy,
ed. Michael Ruse (Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1988), 337–50; Michael Ruse, “Pro
Judice,” in But Is It Science? 357. - Gerry Wheeler, quoted in Claudia Wallis, “The Evolution Wars,” Time,
August 15, 2005, 28; Jonathan Alter, “Monkey See, Monkey Do: Offering ID as an
Alternative to Evolution is a Cruel Joke,” Newsweek, August 15, 2005, 27; Robert George
Sprackland, “A Scientist Tells Why ‘Intelligent Design’ Is NOT Science,” Educational
Digest 71 (January 2006): 33; Chris Mooney, The Republican War on Science (New York:
Basic Books, 2005). - John Pfeiffer, “Scientists Combine to Combat Pseudoscience,” Pyschology Today
11 (November 1977): 38; John Derbyshire, “Teaching Science,” National Review 30 (Au-
gust 2005), http: // old.nationalreview .com / derbyshire; Steven Dutch, “The Great Silly
Season: 1965–1981,” www .uwgb .edu / dutchs. - Martin Gardner, In the Name of Science (New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1952).
- “Proposed System of Classifi cation for Isis Critical Bibliograpy,” Isis 44 (1953):
229–31; http: // www .arts.unimelb .edu.au / amu / ucr / student / 1996. Major works