Endophytes Crop Productivity and Protection Volume 2 (Sustainable Development and Biodiversity)

(Tina Meador) #1

seedlings. P2b-2R endophytically colonized stem and root of cedar seedlings with a


population size of 10^4 – 106 cfu/g fresh tissue and needles with 10^1 – 102 cfu/g fresh


tissue.


Young willow (Salix sitchensis) trees growing in Three Forks Park alongside the


Snoqualmie river in Western Washington state, USA were also evaluated for the


presence of diazotrophic bacterial endophytes by Doty et al. ( 2009 ). Ten endophytic


strains capable of growing on the N-free medium were isolated and were identified


as belonging to the genera Acinetobacter, Herbaspirillum, Pseudomonas,


Sphingomonas, andStenotrophomonas. Two of the willow isolates,Herbaspirillum


sp. WW2 andPseudomonassp. H9zhy (WW6), reduced acetylene to ethylene in


acetylene reduction assay and it was also observed thatPseudomonassp. H9zhy


(WW6) possessnifgenes necessary to encode nitrogenase enzymes (Doty et al.


2009 ). These willow isolates along with some cottonwood isolates (Doty et al.


2005 , 2009 ) were tested for their ability to promote the growth of a distinct host,


Douglas-fir. Khan et al. ( 2015 ) prepared an endophytic consortium by mixing these


endophytic isolates. Endophytic consortium was inoculated into Douglas-fir and


grown in a greenhouse environment for 15 months. Inoculated seedlings had 48%


greater biomass and 13% greater root length and were 16% taller than control


seedlings. Two endophytic isolates, Acinetobacter calcoaceticus WP19 and


Rahnellasp. WP5, were tagged with GFP to visualize endophytic colonization sites
in Douglas-fir (Khan et al. 2015 ). Intercellular colonization of Douglas-fir root


tissues by WP19 and needle tissues by WP5 was observed 3 weeks after inocu-


lation. These results indicate that willow and cottonwood bacterial endophytes not


only colonize the internal tissues of a distinct host (Douglas-fir) but also promote its


growth significantly in a greenhouse environment. Such studies increase our


understanding about the bacterial endophytes that could be valuable for increasing


production of seedlings in forest nurseries.


More than two decades ago, Brooks et al. ( 1994 ) evaluated the role of endo-


phytic bacteria in suppressing oak wilt of live oaks (Quercus fusiformis). Mature


live oaks (50–70 years old) growing in sites located near Round Rock, La Grange,


and Kerrville State Park areas of central Texas, USA were sampled for bacterial


endophytes. After obtaining 889 endophytic isolates from the sapwood of live oaks,


bacteria were screened for in vitro inhibition ofCeratocystis fagacearumfungus. C.


fagacearumcauses vascular disease of oaks, commonly known as oak wilt. The


traditional method of eradicating oak wilt is to remove diseased trees from the site


and break the connections between the healthy and diseased tree (Gibbs and French


1980 ; MacDonald and Hindal 1981 ) or injecting a fungicide into the intravascular


tissues of the oak plant (Appel and Kurdyla 1992 ). Brooks et al. ( 1994 ) hypothe-


sized that biological control through endophyte inoculation could be a possible and


sustainable way of controlling oak wilt. Six endophytic isolates belonging to genera


BacillusandPseudomonaswere screened after in vitro evaluation of their ability to


suppress C.fagacearum. When injected into the stem,Pseudomonasspp. exten-


sively colonized live oaks. The ability ofPseudomonasstrains to control the oak


wilt pathogen in vivo was evaluated in two growth trials. Inoculation decreased the
number of trees diseased by 50% and reduced the crown loss by 17%. This study


126 A. Puri et al.


http://www.ebook3000.com

Free download pdf