Endophytes Crop Productivity and Protection Volume 2 (Sustainable Development and Biodiversity)

(Tina Meador) #1

7.7 Bacterial Endophytes as Biocontrol Agents for Wilt


Endophytic bacteria isolated from live oak stem showed in vitro antagonism against


Colletotrichum fagacearumcausing Oak wilt (Brooks et al. 1994 ). The endophytic


bacteriumBurkholteria cepacia, isolated fromAsparagusexhibited antagonistic


activity against banana wilt (Pan et al. 1997 ). Tomato seedlings treated with


endophyticP.fluorescensas seedling dip increased resistance to wilt disease
(M’Piga et al. 1997 ). Endophytic bacteria isolated from potato tubers showed better


antagonistic activity againstF. avenaciarum, F. sambucinumandF. oxysporum


causing wilt of many tuber and commercial crops (Sturz et al. 1999 ).


Endophytic bacteria isolated from mustard and tomato plants, completely


inhibited the mycelail growth ofV. dahliaeandF. oxysporumf.sp.lycopersici


in vitro and in vivo, it reduces the disease incidence and also increases the plant


growth parameters (more than 75% and increased the plant height and shoot dry


weight) (Nejed and Johnson 2000 ). EndophyticPseudomonassp. (PDBCEN 8)


exhibited maximum mycelia growth inhibition ofFusarium udumon PDA. They


also recorded that endophyticPseudomonassp. (PDBCEN 7) exhibited maximum


inhibition ofR. solanion PDA. The same trend was followed in the endophytic


Pseudomonassp. (PDBCEN 3) against tomatoFusariumwilt (Rangeshwaran et al.


2002 ). Bhowmik et al. ( 2002 ) isolated endophytic bacteria from root and stem


region of cotton seedlings and tested for its antagonistic activity against two fungal


and one bacterial disease in cotton. Among these,five pseudomonads were highly


antagonistic toR. solani, S. rolfsiiandX. axonopodispv.malvacearum(O’Sullivan


and O’Gara 1992 ). Nagarajkumar et al. ( 2004 ) also reported that the production of


siderophores, secondary metabolites and cell wall degrading enzymes by


Pseudomonasstrains may be responsible for the effective control of plant pathogens


includingF. oxysporumandR. solani. Ziedan ( 2006 ) revealed that peanut seeds


were soaked with endophytic bacterial suspensions before sowing reduced the


infection byAspergillus nigerandF. oxysporumcolonization over peanut seed at
30 days after harvesting.


The PGPR strains of Pf1 and TRC 54 were effective in reducing the mycelial


growth ofF. oxysporumf.sp.cubensein vitro. The mycelia growth inhibition might


be due to the production of enzymes and antibiotics by PGPR strains (Akila et al.


2011 ). Nandhini et al. ( 2012 ) who reported that entophytic bacteria were isolated


from root, stem, leaves and fruits and tested for its antagonistic activity against


Fusariumwilt disease in tomato. All the isolates belonging to four bacterial genera


viz.,Bacillus, Pseudomonas, KlebsiellaandCitrobacter. The results revealed that


only 50% of the isolates exhibited strong antagonistic activity against tomato wilt


pathogen. Sundaramoorthy et al. ( 2012 ) who reported that the consortium of rhi-


zospheric and phyllospheric bacterial strains (P.fluorescens(Pf1) andB. subtilis


(EPCO16 and EPC5) strains) reducedFusariumwilt incidence in chilli by 17–30%


compared to control plants.


7 Role of Bacterial Endophytes in Plant Disease Control 143

Free download pdf