Intestinal Nematode Parasites of Vertebrates
Interactions between 11
Intestinal Nematodes and
Vertebrate Hosts
M.V.K. Sukhdeo,
1
S.C. Sukhdeo
2
and A.D. Bansemir
3
(^1) Department of Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers
University, 14 College Farm Road, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA;
(^2) Department of Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers
University, 84 Lipman Drive, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA;
(^3) Division of Life Sciences, Rutgers University, 604 Allison Road,
Piscataway, NJ 08904, USA
Introduction
The phylum Nematoda (roundworms) is one of the largest groups in the
animal kingdom, and some estimates suggest that four out of every five
metazoans are nematodes (Bongers and Ferris, 1999). Gastrointestinal
nematodes represent only a tiny subset of this vast assemblage, but,
because of the severe medical and economic consequences of human
infection (> 3 billion people infected (Montresoret al., 1998)), we know a
lot about these worms. Members of this group are obligate parasites that
spend all, or part, of their lives in the guts and associated organs of their
hosts. Entry into the vertebrate host is usually via oral ingestion or skin
(percutaneous) penetration, and the worms often travel long distances in
their hosts to reach their adult sites. Adult worms typically end up in
narrow and precise microhabitats within the gut, even though most of the
intestinal habitat tends to be vacant of competing parasite species (Rohde
and Hobbs, 1986). Interspecific competition and/or resource-dependent
mechanisms have been proposed to explain this phenomenon (Holmes,
1973; Rohde, 1979, 1992), but there have been few rigorous tests of these
ideas. In addition, parasite decisions on the best locations within the
gut are not independent of higher-level effects of life history and the
constraints of phylogeny. This chapter will focus on the basic strategies
used by gastrointestinal nematodes to get to their habitats in the gut
of vertebrate hosts. Studies on the proximate mechanisms of habitat
selection behaviour and the role of resources (food, attachment and
mates) in parasite strategic decisions will be used to re-examine some
traditional hypotheses on the behaviour of these worms.
CABInternational2002.The Behavioural Ecology of Parasites
(eds E.E. Lewis, J.F. Campbell and M.V.K. Sukhdeo) 223