Caspases,Paracaspases, and Metacaspases Methods and Protocols

(Wang) #1

260



  1. Plasman K et al (2013) Contemporary posi-
    tional proteomics strategies to study protein
    processing. Curr Opin Chem Biol 17:
    66–72

  2. Dix MM et al (2008) Global mapping of the
    topography and magnitude of proteolytic
    events in apoptosis. Cell 134:679–691

  3. Mahrus S et al (2008) Global sequencing of
    proteolytic cleavage sites in apoptosis by spe-
    cifi c labeling of protein N termini. Cell
    134:866–876

  4. Kleifeld O et al (2010) Isotopic labeling of ter-
    minal amines in complex samples identifi es
    protein N-termini and protease cleavage prod-
    ucts. Nat Biotechnol 28:281–288
    5. Gevaert K et al (2003) Exploring proteomes
    and analyzing protein processing by mass spec-
    trometric identifi cation of sorted N-terminal
    peptides. Nat Biotechnol 21:566–569
    6. Schilling O et al (2010) Proteome-wide analy-
    sis of protein carboxy termini: C terminomics.
    Nat Methods 7:508–511
    7. Van Damme P et al (2010) Complementary
    positional proteomics for screening substrates
    of endo- and exoproteases. Nat Methods
    7:512–515
    8. de Poot SA et al (2011) Human and mouse
    granzyme M display divergent and species-
    specifi c substrate specifi cities. Biochem J 437:
    431–442


level of the selected metacaspase. Subsequently, seedlings were
harvested and frozen in liquid nitrogen for protein extraction.


  1. This amount of tissue yields on average about 5 mg of protein
    material.

  2. The recommended amount of protein material per sample is
    4 mg.

  3. The total amount of labelling reagents added suffi ces to label
    the equivalent of up to 4 mg of protein material.

  4. A typical side-reaction of labelling protein primary amino
    groups with N -hydroxysuccinimide esters is the acetylation of
    hydroxyl groups in proteins (serines, threonine, and tyrosine).
    Hydroxylamine is effi cient in reverting this O-acetylation.

  5. At this stage, samples can be subjected to the chromatography
    part of the N-terminal COFRADIC procedure as detailed in
    ref. 14.


Acknowledgments


L.T. acknowledges support from the VIB International PhD
Program and the Netherlands Proteomics Centre, a program
embedded in The Netherlands Genomics Initiative. P.V.D. is a
Postdoctoral Fellow of the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO-
Vlaanderen) and S.S. is indebted to the Special Research Fund of
Ghent University for a postdoctoral fellowship. F.V.B acknowl-
edges support from grants of the Ghent University Multidisciplinary
Research Partnership “Ghent BioEconomy” 27 (project no.
01MRB510W) and of the Belgian Science Policy Offi ce (project
IAP7/29). F.V.B. and K.G. acknowledge support from the
Research Foundation Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen), research proj-
ect G.0038.09.

References


Liana Tsiatsiani et al.

http://www.ebook3000.com
Free download pdf