Revival: Biological Effects of Low Level Exposures to Chemical and Radiation (1992)

(Barry) #1
120 BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF LOW LEVEL EXPOSURES

Table 7.1. Possible Results for a Study


Actual Effect


Study Result
Harmful Neutral Beneficial
Harmful TH FN FL
Neutral FH TN FL
Beneficial FH FN TL
Unspecified H N L

study, measure of outcome employed, spontaneous rate of the disease, and
the number and importance of other potential confounding variables that
may be present.4 Some of these that are under the investigators’ control will
be examined for the effects that their manipulation prior to beginning a
study may have on the probability of correctly classifying a study outcome.
For any study the possible results may be arrayed as in Table 7.1. H, N,
and L denote harmful, neutral, and beneficial, respectively, and T and F
denote true and false. Thus, if a study of a substance whose effects are
actually beneficial results in a statistically significant harmful result, the
study result is a FH (false high); if the actual effect is unspecified, then the
result is simply H. Whatever the actual effect of a substance, the result of
the study will be either H, N, or L. The probabilities of these three events
thus sum to unity for each of the four scenarios in the rows of the table.
In testing for beneficial effects, it is essential that there be a high sponta­
neous rate in the unexposed group, so the beneficial effect can manifest
itself. For if the disease outcome were extremely rare, then even a zero
disease rate in the exposed subjects would not be unusual, and the sensitiv­
ity of the study to detect beneficial effects would be greatly impaired. In
such cases either more sensitive subjects might be found, or case-control
studies might be employed since these may assure sufficient numbers of
disease cases. Failing these or other techniques to increase sensitivity to
detect a TL, serious consideration should be given to abandoning the
study.

Data Layout: Two-by-Two Tables

In many studies the relevant study data can be put in the form of a two-
by-two table, as shown by Table 7.2. The study subjects are presumed to
have been randomly allocated to the exposure groups: nl in the exposed
group and n0 in the nonexposed comparison group. These are then exposed

Table 7.2. Sample Two-by-Two Table

Exposure

Disease
Yes No Total
Yes a b ni
No c d no
Total mi m0 n
Free download pdf