The Routledge Handbook of Consciousness

(vip2019) #1
Andrew Peterson and Tim Bayne

patients will not be able to communicate with those around them (at least not without the aid
of neuroimaging), they are likely to be aware of the presence of friends and family members, and
they may understand at least some of what is said to them (Graham 2017). Such a life affords
some possibilities for meaningful social interaction, albeit in forms that are highly restricted in
scope. It is far from obvious to us that such a life is not a life worth living, although we would
be the first to admit that this question deserves further attention.


9 Conclusion

This chapter has provided an overview of the state-of-the-art neuroimaging and EEG meth-
ods used to detect covert consciousness in post-comatose patients. We have outlined several
philosophical controversies surrounding this research, and have sketched preliminary responses
to a number of these issues. Although post-comatose disorders of consciousness concern only
a relatively narrow subset of brain-injured patients, the scientific study of these patients and
related philosophical reflection on the implications of such research promises to benefit not only
brain-injured patients but will also contribute to our understanding of the nature of conscious-
ness itself.^2


Notes

1 Note that although the print version of Klein’s paper appeared only in 2017, it was published online in
2015, and prior to the publication of Fernández-Espejo et al. (2015).
2 We are grateful to Neil Levy for comments on an earlier draft of this chapter. We also gratefully acknowl-
edge the support of an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship to Bayne (FT150100266).


References

Bardin, J.C., Fins, J.J., Katz, D.I., Hersh, J., Heier, L.A., Tabelow, K., Dyke, J.P., Ballon, D.J., Schiff, N.D., and
Voss, H.U. (2011) “Dissociations between Behavioral and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging-
Based Evaluation of Cognitive Function after Brain Injury,” Brain 134: 769–782.
Bauer, G., Gerstenbrand, F., and Rumpl, E. (1979) “Varieties of the Locked-In Syndrome,” Journal of
Neurology, 221: 77–91.
Bayne, T. and Hohwy, J. (2016) “Modes of Consciousness,” in W. Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.) Consciousness after
Severe Brain Damage: Medical, Legal, Ethical, and Philosophical Perspectives. New York: Oxford University
Press, pp. 57–80.
Bayne, T., Hohwy, J., and Owen, A. (2016) “Are There Levels of Consciousness?” Trends in Cognitive Sciences
20: 405–413.
Bayne, T., Hohwy, J., and Owen, A. (2017) “Reforming the Taxonomy of Disorders of Consciousness,”
Annals of Neurology 82: 866–872.
Beaumont, J. G. and Kenealy, P. M. (2005) “Incidence and Prevalence of the Vegetative and Minimally
Conscious States,” Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 15: 184–189.
Bekinschtein, T.A., Dehaene, S., Rohaut, B., Tadel, F., Cohen, L., and Naccache, L. (2009) “Neural Signature
of the Conscious Processing of Auditory Regularities,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106:
1672–1677.
Bendtsen, K. (2013) “Communicating with the Minimally Conscious: Ethical Implications in End-of-Life
Care,” AJOB Neuroscience 4: 46–51.
Boly, M., Coleman, M.R., Davis, M.H., Hampshire, A., Bor, D., Moonen, G., Maquet, P.A., Pickard, J.D.,
Laureys, S., and Owen, A.M. (2007) “When Thoughts Become Action: An fMRI Paradigm to Study
Volitional Brain Activity in Noncommunicative Brain Injured Patients,” Neuroimage 36: 979–992.
Bruno, M.-A., Bernheim, J.L., Ledoux, D., Pellas, F., Demertzi, A., and Laureys, S. (2011a) “A Survey
on Self-Assessed Well-Being in a Cohort of Chronic Locked-In Syndrome Patients: Happy Majority,
Miserable Minority,” British Medical Journal Open 1: e000039.

Free download pdf