Filling the Ark: Animal Welfare in Disasters

Notes

Introduction

1. For a discussion of the distinction between pets and companion ani-
   mals, see Irvine, If You Tame Me.


2. Park, “Lucky Few.”


3. Stormont, “Help Was Never on the Way.”


4. Kinney, “‘Looting’ or ‘Finding’?”


5. See, e.g., “Katrina Victims Blame Racism for Slow Aid,” NBC News,
   December 6, 2005, http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10354221.


6. Rodríguez and Barnshaw, “Social Construction of Disasters,” 222.
   Works in the vulnerability paradigm include Blaikie et al., At Risk; Bolin and
   Stanford, Northridge Earthquake; Cutter, American Hazardscapes; Hewitt,
   Interpretations of Calamity and Regions of Risk; Peacock et al., Hurricane
   Andrew; Sen, Poverty and Famine.


7. Tierney, “Foreshadowing Katrina.”


8. Blaikie et al., At Risk, 9.


9. Bolin and Stanford, Northridge Earthquake, 42.


10. Peacock et al., Hurricane Andrew.


11. For a review of the literature on gender and disasters, see Fothergill,
    “Gender, Risk, and Disaster.”


12. Klinenberg, Heat Wave, 179, 20–21.