pair of 340 and 525 nm. The final quantitative result of dGSH adduct
formation is expressed as percentage of initial compound concentration. The
positive control,R-(+)-pulegone, usually produces 8–10% of dGSH adduct
under the above conditions (Fig. 14.5). The quantitative analysis of dGSH
adducts of some model compounds are shown in Table 14.1.
15
20
25
30 Blank R-(+)-pulegone
R-(+)-pulegone adduct
dGSH m/z687 (-ESI)
a
Time (min)
8 12162024283236
Fluorescence (mV)
0
5
10
200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700
m/z
20
40
60
80
100
(^252434)
234 361
MS^2
m/z 687
0
487
505
Relative abundance (%)
b 2
FIGURE 14.5 LC/Fluorescence/MS analysis of dGSH adduct ofR-(+)-pulegone. (a)
Fluorescence chromatograms of samples from HLM incubation ofR-(+)-pulegone in
the presence of NADPH and dGSH. Dashed profile was from blank sample withoutR-
(+)-pulegone. (b), ESI–MS^2 spectrum ofR-(+)-pulegone adduct obtained by CID of
the [M-H]ion atm/z687 (negative ionization mode). The fragment ions were all
originated from cleavage of the dGSH moiety [(Gan et al, 2005).]
GLUTATHIONE,N-ACETYLCYSTEINE, AND POTASSIUM CYANIDE 459