Glycerol + C 8 R1,3-Dicaprylin + H 2 O (9)
1,3-Dicaprylin + EPARC 8 (EPA)C 8 +H 2 O (10)
With stoichiometric ratios of the two substrates in a solvent-free system and water
removal by vacuum, 98 % of 1,3-dicaprylin was obtained by the esterification
[Equation (9)] under optimal conditions. 1,3-Dicaprylin was then subjected to the
second chemical esterification [Equation (10)] by using 1,1’-dicyclohexylcarbodii-
mide (DCC) and 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) in dry chloroform. The yield
after purification by silica gel column chromatography was 42 %, and the purity
of TAG was 98 %, of which 90 % was C 8 (EPA)C 8. Thus, the chemo-enzymatic pro-
cess was unsatisfactory. 1,3-DAG can be also produced by chemical esterification of
1,3-dihydroxyacetone with DC in the presence of DMAP followed by reduction by
sodium borohydride (Awe et al., 1989; Baba et al., 1994). The use of expensive,
xenobiotic catalysts and low yields are disadvantages of chemical and chemo-enzy-
matic methods. Therefore, a higher yield of esterification to meet the industrial de-
mand may not be expected unless a more efficient catalyst is found.
More recently, the author’s group has developed a novel two-step enzymatic pro-
cess that seems more promising as shown in Equations (11) and (12) (Rosu et al.,
2000):
Glycerol + 3EPAEER(EPA)(EPA)(EPA) + C 2 H 5 OH (11)
(EPA)(EPA)(EPA) + C 8 EERC 8 (EPA)C 8 + 2EPAEE (12)
The first step [Equation (11)] is an esterification in a solvent-free system with non-
regiospecific lipase. When immobilizedCandida antarcticalipase (NovozymeTM)
was used under optimal conditions in appropriately reduced pressure, over 90 %
yield of the targeted product was achieved from stoichiometric ratios of the sub-
strates. The reaction mixture from step (11) was then subjected to the second
step [Equation (12)] without any purification after separation of the immobilized
enzyme. The second step [12] is again an interesterification in a solvent-free system
with 1,3–regiospecific lipase (Rhizomucor miehei, LipozymeTM). When excess mo-
lar ratio of C 8 EE over tri-EPA (100/1) was used, ca. 100 % of the yield of the targeted
product was obtained (Figure 6). The unreacted C 8 EE and the byproduct (free
caprylic acid, EPAEE and free EPA) can be removed fractionally by short-pass dis-
tillation from the acylglycerol fraction which contains more than 90 % of
C 8 (EPA)C 8. It is to be noted that although molar incorporation of EPA into the gly-
cerol backbone is only one from three moles in a single cycle of the reaction, the two
remaining moles can be reused in the first step [Equation (11)] of the next cycle of the
reaction so that all the EPAEE is eventually converted to the desired sTAG. The
advantages of this process are that: (i) no organic solvent is used; (ii) isolation
and purification of the intermediates is not necessary; and (iii) the liberated EPAEE
(and small amounts of free EPA) and remaining caprylic acid ethyl ester are reusable.
Figure 7A and B depict the typical time courses of reactions shown in Equations (11)
and (12), respectively (Rosu et al., 2000).
9.4 Examples of syntheses of pure sTAG containing PUFA 165