Th eories of Political Control of Bureaucracy 251
administration from politics. Th e explanatory orientation and the underlying
logic in theories of political control virtually require a conceptual distinction be-
tween politics and administration, and it is this distinction that provides such
frameworks with their strength—and with their key weakness.
Th e imposition of the dichotomy provides theories of bureaucratic politics,
at least in their traditional form, with considerable parsimony and elegance. Th is
is accomplished through the expedience of ignoring the messy implications of
politics for administration and clearing the way to conceptualize administra-
tion in technical terms with less worry about how these fi t within the values of
a democratic polity. As long as the dichotomy holds, these theories have high
explanatory capacity—they provide a comprehensive, well-ordered explanation
of administration that serves as a solid guide for action. Th e problem, of course,
TABLE 10.1 Th e Performance of Public Administration Th eories
Theory Replicabilityp y
WParsimony/
EleganceExlanator
CapacityDescriptive
CapacityPredictive
CapacityEmpirical
arrantPolitical
Control of
Bureaucracyhigh high mixed mixed mixed highBureaucratic
Politicsmixed high mixed high mixed highInstitutional low mixed mixed high low mixedPublic
Managementlow mixed low mixed low mixedPostmodern low mixed low high low mixedDecision mixed low-mixed mixed mixed mixed mixedRational high low-mixed high low mixed lowGovernance mixed mixed mixed mixed mixed mixed