Cell Language Theory, The: Connecting Mind And Matter

Cell Language 223

“6x9” b2861 The Cell Language Theory: Connecting Mind and Matter

know that water could form such delicate, sensitive, and diverse structures

(see Figures 4.14 and 15). I had thought that water has too simple a

molecular structure to have any interesting structures comparable to

biopolymers or living cells. But having seen many fascinating CymaGlyphs

(i.e., the water wave patterns visualized with CymaScope) available on the

World Wide Web during the months of October and November 2016,

I was led to form the opinion that water may be compared to 0’s and 1’s

in computer science in the sense that, just as we can represent (or trans-

late) any written text into a series of 0’s and 1’s (see row 3 in Table 4.15).

Furthermore, I came to postulate that any natural structures, no matter

how simple or complex, may be represented by an ensemble of n water

molecules, where n may be 10 to ~ 109 that are organized in space and

time, as supported by the surprising similarities found between

CymaGlyphs and natural forms (see Figure 4.15).

Not only, just as 0’s and 1’s can be used to compute almost any math-

ematical functions in conjunction with the Turing machine (as claimed by

the Church-Turing thesis [512]) and communicate any messages through

the Internet, so perhaps water can compute and communicate as well. This

led the author to formulate what is here referred to as the “water thesis”

or the “water triad” (WT), Statement (4.33), which postulates that water

molecules can not only represent natural structures as revealed by

CymaGlyphs (just as all written texts can be represented as series of 0’s

and 1’s in computer science), but also compute (in the sense that they can

perform rule-governed processes such as forming water structures compa-

rable to Chladni patterns, Figure 4.13) and communicate (in the sense that

they can store information as in, e.g., the Emoto water crystals,

Figure 4.12, for transfer in space and time). If these postulates are sub-

stantiated, the Water Thesis may become consistent with (or obey) the

Church–Turing thesis [512] and the Principle of Computational

Equivalence (PCE) of Wolfram [514] who defines PCE thus:

..., the principle of computational equivalence says that systems found

in the natural world can perform computations up to a maximal (“uni-

versal”) level of computational power, and that most systems do in fact

attain this maximal level of computational power. Consequently, most

systems are computationally equivalent. For example, the workings of

the human brain or the evolution of weather systems can, in principle,

b2861_Ch-04.indd 223 17-10-2017 11:59:07 AM