Cell Language Theory, The: Connecting Mind And Matter

The Philosophical Implications of the Cell Language Theory 415

“6x9” b2861 The Cell Language Theory: Connecting Mind and Matter

G: If you like you can share these modest thought with others.

S: Thanks. I will, in order to elicit some comments from experts in

semiotics and physics on the lists.

The contents of Table 10.4 and Figure 10.10 agree very well with

Statement (10.17) which I read in [403, p. 3657] about a year after con-

structing the table:

The reference of the theoretical entities should not be thought of as an

isomorphic map to the elements of the underlying reality. Theoretical

entities (and a theory in general) only need to have some connections

with reality, i.e. a form of controlled access to them. This is provided

by the operations (like measurement) that represent the bridge

between the theoretical entities (and the formalism) and its ontologi-

cal referents: Thus, operations provide the scaffold of suitable proce-

dures for dealing with the entities that are object of the theory and, in

turn, theoretical entities (together with the formalism) are ways to

understand a reality that is for the great part unobservable as such but

which, through those procedures and relative apparata, one can inter-

act with. (10.17)

Thus it seems that quantum mechanics, at least as interpreted by

Auletta and Torcal [403], is consistent with the triadic metaphysics of

Peirce (Section 6.3.2) in agreement with the Josephson thesis, accord-

ing to which semiotics will eventually “overtake quantum mechanics”,

Statement (4.8).

Table 10.4 The possible relation between quantum mechanics

and the Peircean metaphysics of Firstness, Secondness, and

Thirdness (for definitions, see Section 6.3.2).

Quantum

Mechanics

Peircean

Metaphysics

A Ontology Firstness

B Measurement Secondness

C Theory Thirdness

b2861_Ch-10.indd 415 17-10-2017 12:13:31 PM