Key Terms and Concepts 25“6x9” b2861 The Cell Language Theory: Connecting Mind and Matterconformations. To be specific, when Anfinsen denatured ribonuclease by
adding 2mercaptoethanol (2ME) and urea and allowed the denatured
protein to refold under two different environmental conditions, i.e.,
A (removing urea before 2ME) and B (removing 2ME before urea), the
enzyme refolded into the native conformation under the condition of A but
not under that of B.
Thus, it is logical to conclude thatThe Anfinsen dogma is upheld when the refolding experiment is
performed under the experimental condition A and disproved when it
is carried out under the experimental condition B.In other words,The Anfinsen dogma can be experimentally proven or disproven,
depending on which of the two possible environmental conditions of
the experiment is selected.One corollary of Statements (2.14) and (2.15) is thatThe native folding of proteins is determined not only by their amino
acid sequences but also by the environmental condition under which
proteins fold.One clear evidence to support Statement (2.16) is provided by the
f inding that a prion (“proteinaceous infectious particle”), having an identi
cal amino acid sequence, can fold in two distinct ways to generate PrPC
(cellular prion protein) and PrPSC (scrapie prion protein) isoforms (or iso
conformers), the former having normal physiological functions and the
latter causing transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs) [519].
The concept of the “environment” of a system is synonymous with the
term “boundary condition” of a system. There are two kinds of boundary
conditions — “stationary boundary condition” (SBC) and “moving
boundary condition” (MBC). A boundary condition of a system can
“move” or “change” in space, in time, or in both. An example of a system
with a boundary condition (the combination of which is here conveniently
referred to as a “systome”; see below) that moves is the combination of a(2.14)(2.15)(2.16)b2861_Ch-02.indd 25 17-10-2017 11:39:01 AM