9780521861724htl 1..2

(Jacob Rumans) #1
summation of the feeding niches of the consumer individuals (Fig.6.6). Most
studies suggest that consumer species are, on average, about one to four orders
of magnitude larger than their prey, in terms of body mass (Woodwardet al.,
2005b) as in the Broseet al., ( 2005) database. However, because the size of the
protagonists is rarely measured for individual acts of predation, but taken from
the average size of individuals across the entire population, these reported
ratios are likely to be somewhat misleading. The effect of species averaging
can be seen in the Broadstone Stream food web where, if we calculate the
average consumer-resource ratio by dividing across the total number of feeding
links within the summary food web (i.e. all species pairs of predators and prey,

Pi

A B A B

A B A B

Pi

di dii diii div

Pii Piii Piv

(c)

(d)

(a)

(b)

predator
size

frequency
in diet

foodsize
niche

frequency

predator
size

frequency
in diet

predator
species size
food size
limits

prey species
sizes
distribution of
prey eaten

predator size
distrubution
food size
limits

prey size
distrubution

distribution of
prey eaten

foodsize
niche

frequency

Figure 6.6Scaling from the individual to species-averaged food webs. Panel (a) shows
resource use of a single predator (solid square symbol) feeding on one of a pair of prey
species (each having a distribution of individuals of different sizes). The predator exploits
different sizes of prey with differing effectiveness within the upper and lower size limits of
its feeding niche. Only a portion of the size spectrum of the prey species is exploited, with
upper- and lower-size refugia being evident. Curve B here represents non-exploited ‘prey’
species outside the predator’s size envelope of potential prey. (b) Resource use by four
different predator individuals of different life stages, reflecting ontogenetic shifts in diet
as a predator grows. (c) The distributions of body sizes of both consumers and resources,
across a predator population comprising of many individuals of different sizes of both
predator and prey (square symbols represent the average body size of each species).
(d) Trophic interactions depicted as single links between single nodes, which are the species
represented by their average size (square symbols), as in species-averaged food webs.

108 G. WOODWARD AND P. WARREN

Free download pdf