01234501234501230123012301230123Trophic levelTrophic levelLog 10 Biomass (g m–2)01230123012301230123Figure 7.4Trophic pyramids from the five lakes with the fastest (upper) and slowest
(lower) turnover of primary producers (estimated as the proportion of the biomass that
was slow relative to fast turnover primary producers) across a gradient of increasing
intensity of top-down effects of fish (fish–invertebrates–periphyton–plants; Jones &
Sayer, 2003 ).–0.5–0.4–0.3–0.2–0.100.10.20 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2Slope of Trophic PyramidProportion of Biomass of Slow to Fast Turnover Primary
ProducersSquare–InvertedTriangularPhytoplankton Macrophytes
Figure 7.5Relationship
between slope of the
trophic pyramids in
17 lakes across a
gradient of increasing
intensity of top-down
effects of fish and the
proportion of biomass of
slow to fast turnover
primary producers.
y¼0.5104xþ0.196,
R^2 ¼0.387, p¼0.004.130 J. I. JONES AND E. JEPPESEN