meiofauna–macrofauna size spectrum, but these have confirmed the bimodal
species size distribution, with many meiofaunal and many macrofaunal
species, but few of intermediate size (Warwicket al., 1986 ;Warwick&Joint,
1987 ;Kendall,Warwick&Somerfield,1997 ). An intuitive explanation for this
follows Schwinghamer’s (1981 ) explanation for the ataxonomic benthic biomass
spectrum concerning the constraint on body size of sediment granulometry.
10 –1 100 101 102 103 104
Length (mm)12345678910111213141516171819Number of speciesFigure 11.1Numbers of species in regional species pools of guilds of marine animals
divided into size categories on a1:28 geometric scale. 1 – Tardigrades, Britain (Morgan &
King, 1976 ); 2 – Selective deposit feeding (bactivorous) nematodes, Chile (Wieser, 1959 );
3 – Non-selective deposit feeding nematodes, Chile (Wieser, 1959 ); 4 – Epistrate (diatom)
feeding nematodes, Chile (Wieser, 1959 ); 5 – Carnivorous/omnivorous nematodes, Chile
(Wieser, 1959 ); 6 – Harpacticoid copepods, Norway (Sars, 1911 ); 7 – Calanoid copepods,
Norway (Sars, 1903 ); 8 – Ostracods, Norway (Sars, 1928 ); 9 – Gammarid amphipods, Britain
(Lincoln, 1979 ); 10 – Cumaceans, Britain (Jones, 1976 ); 11 – Mysids, Britain (Tattersall &
Tattersall, 1951 ); 12 – Shrimps and prawns, Britain (Smaldon, 1979 ); 13 – Filter-feeding
bivalves, Britain (Tebble, 1966 ); 14 – Ophiuroids, Britain (Mortensen, 1927 ); 15 – Regular
echinoids, Britain (Mortensen, 1927 ); 16 – Irregular echinoids, Britain (Mortensen, 1927 );
17 – Flatfish, NW Europe (Wheeler, 1969 ); 18 – Gadoids, NW Europe (Wheeler, 1969 );
19 – toothed whales, Europe (Van den Brink, 1967 ).
BODY SIZE AND DIVERSITY IN MARINE SYSTEMS 213