of the Ogeechee snag-habitat itself. A significant proportion of the production of
the snag community is subsidized by organic seston (suspended particles) that is
continuously delivered from habitats upstream. This high-quality and abundant
food source supports exceedingly high densities of filter-feeding organisms on
the snags (Benke & Parsons, 1990 ; Benke & Wallace, 1997 ; Benke, 1998 ). This is
reflected, to some degree, by the high densities of small organisms in the
Ogeechee River community compared with the temperate streams (Figs.4.2&
4.7). Other types of primary consumers, however, must browse organic matter
directly from the surface of the snag (Benke & Jacobi, 1986 , 1994; Benke, 1998 ).
Differences in resource quality and supply rate, along with the relative meta-
bolic costs of radically different feeding strategies, could potentially cause scal-
ing exponents to depart from predicted values due to a confounding effect of
source of food (e.g. seston vs. biofilm) and body size. Knowledge of the compa-
rative bioenergetics of these different feeding guilds, and whether these are
confounded with the size-distribution of the integrated snag community, is
required to assess this hypothesis properly.
In summary, the overarching hypothesis of metabolic theory, that the common-
ality of metabolic processes across scales from cellular to ecosystem explains the
relationship between body size and N, B, P and the P/B, was clearly not rejected for
our sample, albeit small, of temperate-stream communities. This finding suggests
that the following conditions may be of primary importance in determining
trophic level or position
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
Ogeechee River Ball Creek
012 3 4 5 6 7 012 3 4 5 6 7
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4 Sutton Stream Stony Creek
012 3 4 5 6 7 012 3 4 5 6 7
log 10 M (∝g)
Figure 4.9Plots of annual trophic
level or trophic position against
log 10 M (individual taxa,mg/
individual) for four stream
communities (see Fig.4.2for details).
Trophic position (sensuBenke &
Wallace, 1997 ) for taxa from the
Ogeechee River was estimated on
the basis of gut content analysis.
Trophic level for taxa from the
remaining three communities was
presumed on the basis of published
feeding habits and limited gut
analysis.
BIOMASS TURNOVER AND BODY SIZE 67