184 Notes to pages 150–4
- Little, My Diary in a Chinese Farm, introductory words. Th e anti-foreignism in Chong-
qing is a concept much more ambiguous in nature than we have previously acknowledged.
Th e attacks on Westerners are oft en attributed to xenophobia or a fear of foreigners as a
response to imperialism. However, Wyman proposes that the hostility is also fashioned
by Chinese domestic unrest and tensions. Th us, the foreigners are targeted not only
because of their foreign identity but also because they fall into a category of outsiders
that includes many Chinese. Th is contributes to the shift ing views of Chinese insiders
and outsiders. J. Wyman, ‘Th e Ambiguities of Chinese Antiforeignism: Chongqing,
1870–1900’, Late Imperial China, 18:2 (Baltimore, MD: Th e Johns Hopkins University
Press, 1997) pp. 86–122, on p. 86. - M. L. Pratt, Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation (New York: Routledge,
1992), p. 7. - Little, My Diary in a Chinese Farm, p. 1.
- Pratt, Imperial Eyes, p. 4.
- Little, My Diary in a Chinese Farm, p. 51.
35. See Wyman, ‘Th e Ambiguities of Chinese Antiforeignism’, p. 86.
36. Fiske, ‘Asian Awakenings’, p. 16.
37. Little, Intimate China, p. 168.
38. Little, My Diary in a Chinese Farm, pp. 33–4.
39. Ibid., introductory words.
40. J. Cliff ord, ‘On Ethnographic Allegory’, in J. Cliff ord and G. E. Marcus (eds), Writing
Culture: Th e Poetics and Politics of Ethnography (Berkeley, CA, Los Angeles, CA, and
London: University of California Press, 1986), pp. 98–122, on p. 112.
41. S. S. Friedman, Mappings: Feminism and the Cultural Geographies of Encounter (Prince-
ton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998), p. 100.
42. E. Said, Th e World, the Text, and the Critic (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,
1983), p. 220.
43. Little, My Diary in a Chinese Farm, p. 17.
44. E. Said, Culture and Imperialism (New York: Vintage, 1993), p. 87.
45. See also Gikandi, Maps of Englishness, p. 86 and C. Kaplan, Questions of Travel (Durham,
NC: Duke University Press, 2000), p. 49.
46. D. Massey, For Space (London: Sage, 2005), p. 171.
47. M. Woods, ‘Engaging the Global Countryside: Globalization, Hybridity and the Reconsti-
tution of Rural Place’, Progress in Human Geography, 31:4 (2007), pp. 485–507, on p. 486.
48. I. Grewal and C. Kaplan, Scattered Hegemonies: Postmodernity and Transnational Femi-
nist Practices (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2006), p. 17.
49. I. Grewal, Home and Harem: Nation, Gender, Empire, and the Cultures of Travel (Dur-
ham, NC: Duke University Press, 1996), p. 24.
50. Friedman, Mappings, p. 112. - Grewal, Home and Harem, p. 242.
- See Cliff ord, ‘On Ethnographic Allegory’, p. 112, and A. Appadurai, Modernity at Large:
Cultural Dimensions of Globalization (Minneapolis, MN, and London: University of
Minnesota Press, 2003), p. 198. - R. Robertson, Glocalization: Social Th eory and Global Culture (London: SAGE, 1992),
p. 30. - C. Kaplan, ‘Th e Politics of Location as Transnational Feminist Critical Practice’, in Gre-
wal and Kaplan (eds), Scattered Hegemonies, pp. 137–52, on p. 142.