6 Evidence Appraisal: Research 141
including research findings, into practice decisions. Research articles can be in-
timidating to novice and expert nurses alike. Because many EBP teams do not
have the skill set to fully judge the proper use of statistics in the studies under
review, it is highly recommended that teams draw on research texts, mentors, or
experts to guide the process.
Nurse leaders can best support EBP by providing clinicians with the knowl-
edge and skills necessary to appraise research evidence. Only through continu-
ous learning can clinicians gain the confidence needed to incorporate evidence
gleaned from research into the day-to-day care of individual patients.
Summary
This chapter arms EBP teams with practical information to guide the appraisal
of research evidence, a task that is often difficult for nonresearchers. An overview
of the various types of research evidence is presented, including attention to indi-
vidual research studies and summaries of multiple research studies. Tips for read-
ing research reports are provided, along with guidance on how to appraise the
strength and quality of research evidence.
References
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). (2011). Evidence-based Practice Centers.
Retrieved from http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epc
Al-Yateem, N. (2013). Guidelines for the transition from child to adult cystic fibrosis care. Nursing
Children and Young People, 25(5), 29–34.
Back, J., Jin, Y., Jin, T., & Lee, S. (2016). Development and validation of an automated sepsis risk
assessment system. Journal of Nursing & Health, 39, 317–327.
Beck, C. T., & Harrison, L. (2016). Mixed-methods research in the discipline of nursing. Advances in
Nursing Science, 39 (3), 224–234.
Belli, G. (2009). Analysis and interpretation of nonexperimental studies. In Lapan, S. D., &
Quartaroli, M. T. (Eds.). Research Essentials: An Introduction to Designs and Practices, pp.
59–77. Retrieved from http://media.wiley.com/product_data/excer
pt/95/04701810/0470181095-1.pdf
Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2015). Grounded theory: A practical guide (2nd ed.).: Thousand Oaks, CA:
SAGE.
Bourgault, A., Heath, J., Hooper, V., Sole, M., Waller, J., & NeSmith, E. (2014). Factors influencing
critical-care nurses’ adoption of the AACN practice alert on verification of feeding tube
placement. American Journal of Critical Care, 23 (2), 134–144.
