due  to  insufficient    time    to  disperse    to  it.     Probably    this    argument    applies     to  most
marine  groups, so  the real    advantage   is  that    Jumars  and Fauchald    know    polychaetes.
(^) In   their   1979    paper,  Fauchald    and     Jumars  presented   a   functional  classification,
mostly  based   on  feeding mode,   for the polychaetes,    a   class   consisting  of  81  family
groups  totaling    (up to  1980)   roughly 6000    species (now    ∼9000). Much    of  the known
biology  of  feeding     for     the     entire  class   was     included    in  a   family-by-family    review.
They    used    this    to  construct   a   classification  of  polychaete  feeding under   three   main
aspects.
(^1) Size   of  particles   eaten:  microphages vs. macrophages
(^) Microphages eat tiny    particles   and tend    to  eat them    in  bulk.   Divided
again   by  feeding stratum:    burrowers,  filter  feeders and surface deposit
feeders
(^) Macrophages  eat     large   chunks  either  whole   or  by  removing    bites.
Divided again   between herbivores  and carnivores
(^2) Mobility   required    for feeding
(^) Sessile:    never   moving, sometimes   not capable of  moving
(^) Discretely  motile: sometimes   moving  to  get better  foraging,   but usually
not moving  while   actually    feeding
(^) Motile: moving  while   feeding
(^3) Mode   of  ingestion   (varies between micro-  and macrophages)
(^) jaws    (sometimes  based   on  an  eversible   pharynx)
(^) tentacles
(^) pumping
(^) “X” –   special
(^) The overall classification  came    out as  shown   in  Table   ^ 14.1, which   is  simplified  here
from    the original,   and in  Fig.    14.12.  While   feeding is  the basis   of  the classification,
there   is  strong  correlation with    other   life    functions.  Mobile  and tubiculous  forms,  for
example,    have    different   modes   of  defense against predators,  different   requirements    for
mating, and  so on.  There   are    21   groups with     significant     “occupation”   by   kinds   of
polychaetes,    each    group   identified  by  an  acronym.    For example,    BMJ is  a   burrowing
motile-jawed     subclass    of  microphagic     feeders.    Fauchald    and     Jumars  call    these
“feeding    guilds”.    Ecologists  borrowed    the notion  of  guilds  from    late-medieval   history.
Guilds   were    the     craft   unions  of  the     late    Middle  Ages,   such    as  the     tanner’s    guild,
