Front Matter

(nextflipdebug5) #1
Chapter 16 Biological Therapies in Canine Sports Medicine 407

they are convenient and require less time and
hands‐on work (Figure 16.3). In addition, these
commercially available point‐of‐care systems
might facilitate maintenance of sterility and
could potentially produce a more consistent
PRP product, although this has not been
demonstrated.


Commercially available PRP preparation
systems

Most PRP systems were designed and manu‑
factured for preparing PRP from human blood.
However, the cellular elements in human blood
differ from those in canine blood in character‑
istics such as size, density, and sedimentation
rate. Hence, characteristics of PRP acquired
using a given system with human blood are not
necessarily representative of the PRP that is
acquired using the same system with canine
blood. Therefore, it is important that data from
dogs are considered. Fortunately, there are now
several studies characterizing PRPs made with
canine blood (Thoesen et  al., 2006; Stief et  al.,
2011; Carr et al., 2015; Franklin et al., 2015; Frye
et al., 2016). Of these, one author (SF) completed
a 15‐dog cross‐over study assessing the charac‑
teristics of PRP made with five different PRP
systems (Franklin et  al., 2015). The degree of
platelet concentration varied from platelet
reduction in one system to an average increase
of five‐fold over baseline with another system.
Similarly, three systems produced a PRP with
negligible hematocrit while the PRP from two
systems consistently had a notable hematocrit.
Lastly, some systems produced leukocyte‐rich
PRP while other produced a leuko‐reduced PRP.
Growth factor concentrations (TGF‐β1,
PDGF‐BB) were also quantified in these PRPs.
As with human PRPs, there were moderate
correlations between the platelet concentration
and the anabolic growth factor concentrations
(Sundman et  al., 2011). However, the greatest
variable influencing growth factor concentra‑
tion was intentional activation of the PRP. This
became apparent as one of the PRP systems
included a calcium chloride activator that was
used during the PRP preparation. Although the
platelet concentration in this PRP was moderate,
it had significantly higher TGF‐β1 and PDGF‐
BB concentrations than all other PRPs. Further
investigation with one of the other PRP prepa‑
rations confirmed that platelets in such a PRP
preparation are not activated during the PRP
preparation process. Like platelets in human
and equine PRPs, these platelets were capable
of activation, and growth factor release was
dramatically increased once the PRP was mixed
with either calcium chloride or thrombin, with
thrombin producing the most robust activation

Figure 16.2 Platelet pellet after a second centrifugation
in a double‐spin platelet‐rich plasma preparation
protocol.


Figure 16.3 Platelet‐rich plasma (PRP) preparation
machine that can provide automated separation of the
blood into separate fractions including platelet‐poor
plasma, PRP, and the red blood cell pellet.

Free download pdf