Monitoring Threatened Species and Ecological Communities

(Ben Green) #1

7 – The extent and adequacy of monitoring for Australian threatened freshwater fish species^93


Table 7.2.

Mean scores and statistical tests comparing medians of adequacy of m

onitoring of Australian threatened freshwater fish.

Letters indicate significantly different categories after correction for type 1 error

.

Comparison

Categories

Sample size

Periodicity

Coverage

Management

linkage

Coordination

Data availability

and reporting

Design quality

Fit-for-purpose

Demographic

parameters

Longevity

EPBC Status

Listed

38

2.4

2.3

1.6

1.9

1.5

1.8

2.1

1.5

1.7

Not Listed

19

1.6

1.9

1.8

1.7

0.5

0.8

1.6

0.8

0.8

z test

1.67

0.23

0.02

0.43

2.31

*

2.35

*

1.03

1.45

1.92

EPBC categories

Endangered

15

2.9

3 .1

a

2.2

2.5

1.9

2.2

2.8

2.1

2.5

a

Vulnerable

17

1.9

1.4

b

1.3

1.1

0.9

1.2

1.5

1.1

1.2

b

Critically Endangered

5

2.4

2.4

ab

0.8

2.4

2.0

1.8

1.8

1.2

1.0

ab

(^2) χ
test
1.70
6.77



  • 3.98
    5.30
    4.98
    2.79
    3.71
    4.02
    6.34


  • Type of EPBC listing
    State only
    23
    2.6
    2.3
    1.9
    2.3
    1.6
    1.9
    2.3
    1.6
    1.8
    Multi-jurisdictional
    15
    2.1
    2.3
    1.2
    1.4
    1.3
    1.6
    1.9
    1.4
    1.7
    z test
    0.84
    0.02
    1.19
    0.87
    0.47
    0.66
    0.70
    0.27
    0.20
    State comparisons
    Tasmania
    8
    4.6
    a
    3.9
    a
    3.5
    a
    4.0
    a
    2.5
    3.4
    a
    4.0
    a
    3.3
    a
    2.9
    a
    Queensland
    8
    1.9
    b
    1.3
    b
    1.3
    b
    1.1
    b
    1.3
    1.0
    b
    1.6
    b
    1.0
    b
    1.0
    ab
    Western Australia
    4
    0.8
    b
    0.8
    b
    0.0
    b
    0.8
    b
    0.8
    0.8
    b
    0.5
    b
    0.0
    b
    0.23
    b
    (^2) χ
    test
    7.7 8




  • 9.86

    10.97

    13.76




    4.02





  1. 24


***


  1. 9 4


*

11.6 6

**

7.7 2

*

Recovery Plan status (EPBC listed)

Recovery plan

27

2.9

2.8

2.1

2.4

1.9

2.2

2.6

2.0

2.1

No recovery plan

11

1.2

0.9

0.5

0.7

0.5

0.6

0.9

0.5

0.8

z test

2.24

*

2.53

*

2.6

**

2.60

**

2.58

*

2.84

***

2.45

*

2.59

*

2.26

*

*Statistical level of significance <0.05** Statistical level of significance <0.01*** Statistical level of significance <0.005.
Free download pdf