LWBK1006-42 LWW-Govindan-Review December 12, 2011 20:38
534 DeVita, Hellman, and Rosenberg’s CANCER: Principles and Practice of Oncology Review
preexisting CMV immunity to the recipient, compared with a CMV-na ̈ıve
donor.
Answer 42.17. The answer is E.
Mobilization and harvest of hematopoietic stem cells from peripheral
blood with G-CSF leads to significantly higher numbers of CD34+cells
and results in a shorter time to engraftment of both neutrophils and
platelets, compared with bone marrow. Despite significantly higher num-
bers of T cells, there was no evidence of a significant increase in the inci-
dence of acute GVHD in a randomized trial of peripheral blood mononu-
clear cell (PBMC) versus bone marrow, although a trend toward increased
chronic GVHD in PBMC recipients was observed.
Answer 42.18. The answer is B.
Because of its substantial treatment-related morbidity and mortality, allo-
geneic stem cell transplantation is generally reserved for patients with
hematologic malignancies with a low likelihood of cure with lower risk
alternatives, including conventional chemotherapy and/or autologous
HCT. Patients with AML with inversion 16 and translocation (8;22)
in remission have a favorable prognosis for cure with high-dose cytara-
bine consolidation and are generally only considered for allogeneic HCT
in the event of relapse. In contrast, patients with AML with high-risk
cytogenetics, including deletions of chromosomes 5 and 7, and com-
plex karyotypes, are rarely cured with conventional chemotherapy or
autologous HCT, and should be referred for consideration of allogeneic
HCT when in remission. Relapsed patients with intermediate-grade non-
Hodgkin’s lymphoma who respond to salvage chemotherapy may be
cured with autologous stem cell transplantation with a relatively low risk
of treatment-related morbidity and mortality. Because of the generally
indolent nature of CLL, initial remissions may persist for years. Although
potentially curative for CLL, the early mortality risk associated with allo-
geneic HCT is generally not justified in this scenario, although it may be
appropriate in selected patients with more advanced, multiply relapsed
disease.
Answer 42.19. The answer is D.
DLIs by design result in the infusion of large numbers of effector T cells
with the goal of augmenting an alloimmune response directed against
residual host-derived tumor cells. An unintended negative consequence,
however, is the simultaneous infusion of alloreactive T-cell clones directed
at normal tissue that may result in a significant flare in GVHD. In the case
of relapsed CML, a substantial percentage of host hematopoiesis may be
derived from the residual leukemic clone at relapse, in which case the
development of the desired GVL effect may be associated with transient
marrow aplasia. VOD is typically observed during the first 2 to 3 weeks
posttransplant and is thought to result from endothelial damage caused
by the conditioning regimen.