The ASIC contributes
little, if anything to
security even at our major
airports, at anytime there
will be dozens of people
without ASICs on the
tarmac. I know, I was one
gates, one pedestrian,
one vehicle; I preferred to
step over the fence beside
the gates.
Although it is accepted
that a high level of security
is required at our major
airports, at regional
airports the only place
where a reasonable level of
security can, and should
be achieved is the RPT
parking area. The current
illusion of security that
currently exists at our
regional and GA airports
is easily revealed by anyone
who wants to bother to
make the effort.
australianflying.com.au 11
July – August 2018 AUSTRALIAN FLYING
p: (02) 9766 0200
http://www.heliflite.com.au
Robinson sales: 0403 196 219
AUTHORISED ROBINSON DISTRIBUTOR
#1 SELLING HELICOPTER RANGE
Supporting
Aviation in Australia since 1977
it could go viral, and the
next thing there would
be people on the runway.
Really! Apparently in
Alice, local pilots are
trustworthy, but
visiting pilots are
definitely suspect.
At all of the security
airports we visited, I
sought to gain access
without using the keypad
code, using only the
things I had on or around
me, such as a finger, stick
or credit card, and was
about 70% successful.
In one case all that was
required was a sharp
push on the gate.
The only glimmers of
common sense I found,
were at two airports
where the access code
was displayed under a
hinged f lap on the inside
of the gate. Cooktown
has a pair of most
magnificent security
Apparently in Alice, local
pilots are trustworthy,
but visiting pilots are
deinitely suspect.
ABOVE: A
reader says
the concerns
raised by
the Multicom
sticker in 1991
are still valid
today.
of those people for many
years and was never asked
to produce an ASIC.
The only areas that
should require a security
pass are the parking and
processing areas for RPT
and cargo aircraft. No
GA area should require
a security pass, if the
Americans can make it
work, why not us?
Geoff Carr
edited for length
Hurry up and
Weight
Dear Steve,
RAAus put in their bid
for an increase in weight
nearly two years ago and
still CASA has done
nothing. What are they
waiting for? RAAus has
shown they have the
ability to administer
aircraft and run
maintenance programs
so that recreational
aircraft are now safer
and being operated in
a much safer manner.
CASA can learn
more from RAAus than
RAAus can learn from
CASA, so why doesn’t
CASA just give them the
extra weight?
This looks to me like
CASA just wanting
recreational aviation to
stay in the paddocks.
Cal Braddon