78 Culture TheEconomistMay7th 2022
Mr Gates tentatively proposes that it be
called germ(Global Epidemic Response
and Mobilisation). The pr department
might not like the name, but the idea is
worth exploring. He estimates germitself
would cost about $1bn a year. While wait
ing for the call, its staff would be employed
in beefing up the world’s antipandemic
infrastructure—this is where thediploma
cy would come in—by chivvyinggovern
ments into the necessary spendingonde
tecting, monitoring and suppressing
potential outbreaks. And in runningdrills.
On the technological side, hisshopping
list includes designing and agreeingon
protocols for the rapid masstesting of
drugs that might work againsta particular
pathogen if an outbreak did happen.(Brit
ain’s recoverytrial, which wasreadytogo
within six weeks of covid19 beingidenti
fied, and eventually included 40,000par
ticipants at 185 sites, comes inforparticu
lar praise here.) Mr Gates alsowantsto
improve both vaccine manufacturingand
distribution, and to improve vaccines
themselves, particularly by eliminating
cold chains.
Most existing vaccines are tempera
turesensitive, and must be passedquickly
from one refrigerator to anotherenroute
to the clinics where they will beused.Mr
Gates recommends research intothede
velopment of heattolerant vaccines.For
pathogens that spread throughtheair,he
favours a cuttingedge approachtopreven
tion: nasal sprays containingdrugsthat
bind to the cellsurface proteinswhichvi
ruses use to gain entry, thus denyingthem
the means to get into their targetcells.
And he envisages new, broadspectrum
jabs against entire classes of viruses,such
as influenza. Technooptimistthatheis,
he suggests such universal vaccinescould
not only preempt illnesses ofthefuture,
but annihilate those of the present. In
other words, no more flu. Ever.
That does sound pretty optimistic,es
pecially given the difficulty ofeliminating
even single viruses from the planet—
something that has been achievedonlyfor
smallpox and for a cattle diseasecalledrin
derpest, and has notably not happenedfor
polio, which still lingers in a fewplacesde
spite a decadeslong campaigntogetridof
it. But, as Arthur C. Clarke put itinhissec
ond law of science, “The only wayofdisco
vering the limits of the possibleistoven
ture past them into the impossible.”
Whether anything like germwillever
come to pass, as the world’s attention
shifts from the crisis of covid19totheca
tastrophe in Ukraine, remainstobeseen.
But if this book stimulates evena littlelim
itpushing of the sort Mr Gatessuggests,it
willhaveserveditspurposewell. n
“TheGoodSoldierSvejk”
The idiocy of war
I
t iswithpridethatJosefSvejkdeclares
to his superior officer: “I dutifully report,
Colonel Sir, that I am an idiot.” He has
already been kicked out of the AustroHun
garian army once for being an imbecile.
Since then he has scraped a living in Prague
selling stolen dogs. On hearing of the
assassination of Franz Ferdinand, Svejk
initially confuses the archduke with
another Ferdinand who cleans dog mess
off the streets. The war that follows sees
Svejk called up to serve the empire again.
“The Fateful Adventures of the Good
Soldier Svejk During the World War”
(known as “The Good Soldier Svejk”) fol
lows the selfproclaimed fool’s circuitous
journey to the front. Jaroslav Hasek pub
lished three volumes of his antiwar satire
between 1921 and 1923; he was working on a
fourth when he died.
Svejk is a picaro who drifts between
places and masters. He follows his orders
to the letter. Told to attend to every desire
of a lieutenant’s mistress, Svejk does as she
wishes and sleeps with her. Instructed to
find a dog for the lieutenant, he steals one
from a colonel—who sends the whole bat
talion to the front as punishment.
Eventually Svejk is thrown off a train
headingtotheeasternfrontintheAustro
HungarianprovinceofGalicia,sodecides
towalk.Hisownsidetakeshimfora Rus
siandeserterandhenarrowlyescapesexe
cution. He rejoins his unit, and here—
before he sees combat—the novel stops.
Svejk is often compared to Yossarian,
the American captain in Joseph Heller’s
“Catch22” whose aim is to survive the sec
ond world war at all costs. Heller played
down suggestions that he took inspiration
from Hasek, describing his story as “just a
funny book”. But if that were accurate,
Svejk would be just an idiot. In fact he is a
master of subversion, a little man who
keeps himself out of the regime’s war sim
ply by following orders.
Hasek’s life was almost as chaotic as his
character’s. He too was sent to the eastern
front; later he joined the Red Army and
hobnobbed with Trotsky, eventually sever
ing his communist links. Many writers
have tried to finish his saga (Bertold Brecht
wrote a play in which Svejk crosses paths
with Adolf Hitler). But none has captured
the Czech imagination as successfully as
Hasek, helped by Josef Lada’s Tintinesque
illustrations in early editions (see picture).
“To svejk” has entered the Czech vocab
ulary, meaning to undermine authority
through stupidity. In 1968, when the Soviet
Union installed Gustav Husak as Czecho
slovakia’s leader after the Prague Spring, he
urged people to “Stop svejking”. (The Sovi
ets, missing the point, lauded Hasek’s
work.) Svejk’s buffoonery has left its mark
across Europe. From Athens to Warsaw,
dozens of imitations of “U Kalicha” (At The
Chalice), Svejk’s local, serve steins of Czech
lager. Ingrida Simonyte, Lithuania’s prime
minister, quotes Svejk in her speeches.
Today much of what was once Galicia is
in Ukraine. The Russian soldiers now wag
ing a senseless war in that country could
do worse than read “The Good Soldier
Svejk”. With luck, its sendupof swagger
ing authority might inspirethem to try a
bit of svejking themselves.n
Jaroslav Hasek’s satire makes a
mockery of bellicose authority
home
entertainment
To hear our interview with Bill Gates, go to
economist.com /billgatespod