The Economist - UK (2022-05-07)

(Antfer) #1
TheEconomistMay7th 2022
Graphic detail Abortion in America

85

Church and choice


S


hockedbyadraftSupremeCourtopin­
ion that would allow states to ban abor­
tion, American liberals are hunting for sil­
ver  linings.  Some  hope  that  women  en­
raged by the loss of Roe v Wadewill vote en
masse for Democrats in November.
That  would  put  Republicans  in  swing
states at risk. However, liberal activists fo­
cus solely on the gender gap at their peril:
women are almost as likely as men to op­
pose abortion. The most reliable backers of
abortion  rights  are  the  30%  of  Americans
with no religious affiliation.
Views on abortion have been fairly sta­
ble  over  time.  Big  majorities  favour  legal
abortion  in  cases  of  rape  or  health  risks.
Since 2002 the share of participants in the
General Social Survey, a large poll, who say
abortion,  for  any  reason,  should  be  legal
has climbed from 40% to 54%. Compared
with  the  change  in  support  for  gay  mar­
riage, however, this increase looks modest.
Although  state­level  polls  on  abortion
are sparse, public opinion in each state can
be estimated using demographic and geo­
graphic  patterns  in  national  surveys.  This
method shows that just 12 of the 50 states
have majorities that want to ban abortion,
or allow it only if the mother’s life is at risk.
In  contrast,  19  states  have  laws  limiting
abortion that would take effect the day Roe
is  reversed.  They  include  Arizona,  Michi­
gan  and  Wisconsin,  where  an  estimated
60% of people favour abortion rights.
Voters  likely  to  mourn  the  loss  of  Roe
can be targeted demographically. The gen­
der gap in views on abortion is modest, at
six percentage points. Religion and race, in
contrast, account for up to 65 points.
In a sample of 13,659 people surveyed by
YouGov, a pollster, just 28% of white or old­
er  Hispanic  evangelicals  wanted  abortion
to  be  “always”  or  “mostly”  legal.  Despite
the Catholic and Orthodox churches’ oppo­
sition, 53% of whites and 65% of Hispanics
in  these  groups  favoured  abortion  rights.
Among  agnostics  and  people  who  did  not
list  a  religion,  the  shares  were  61%  for
those who did not attend college, and 79%
for  people  who  did.  Other  strong  backers
were Jews (76%) and atheists (a hefty 92%).
America’s  political  coalitions  reflect
these  cleavages  already.  However,  whites
who  are  non­evangelical  Protestants,  or
who are not religiously affiliated and lack
college  degrees,  favour  abortion rights
more than they do Democratic candidates.
Their loyalty may now be up for grabs.n

Religion, not gender, is the best
predictor of views on abortion

40

20

60

80

100%

02550 75 100%

1970 80 90 2000 10 21

→ After decades of stability, support for abortion rights has begun to rise

→WithoutRoev Wade, muchoftheSouthwouldlackabortionproviders

→Religionshapesviewsonabortion,butitsimpactvariesbyrace

United States, share of respondents that support abortion in cases of:

Shareofrespondentswhothinkabortionshouldbe“mostly”or“always”legal

Distancetonearestabortionprovider,inscenariowhereRoev Wadeisoverturned
Bycounty,miles

Sources:YouGov;GeneralSocialSurvey;PewResearchCentre;CaitlynMyers *OrOrthodoxChristian

Abortion facilities likely to

States likely to
ban abortion

Close Stay open

Comparedwith support
forsame-sex marriage

Supportforabortion
foranyreason

Mother’shealthatrisk Rape Risk of birth defect

0 100 200 300 400 30

EvangelicalProtestant
18-55

Atheist

Hispanic

Black

White

Selectedgroups
byrace

Sample

500 2,000

Catholic* Jewish

Aged5+ Nocollege College

Mainline
Protestant

No religious identification
Free download pdf