genotype ×
environment (G×E)
interaction
heterochrony
heterotopy
homeotic selector
gene
Hox gene
individualization
interaction
module, modular
neoteny
ontogeny
paedomorphosis
phenotypic
integration
phenotypic plasticity
reaction norm
serially homologous
trans-regulatory
element
transcription factor
(TF)
transgenic
SuGGESTionS FoR FuRTHER REAdinG
An excellent, very readable introduction to cur-
rent evolutionary developmental biology,
emphasizing regulation of gene expression,
is From DNA to Diversity: Molecular Genetics
and the Evolution of Animal Design by Sean
B. Carroll, Jennifer K. Grenier, and Scott d.
Weatherbee (second edition, Blackwell Sci-
ence, malden, mA, 2005). For the more gen-
eral science reader, S. B. Carroll describes the
development of EdB in Endless Forms Most
Beautiful: The New Science of Evo-Devo (W.
W. norton, new York, 2006).
david l. Stern provides a clear exposition of
developmental pathways and their evolution
in Evolution, Development, & The Predictable
Genome (Roberts and Company, Greenwood
village, Co, 2011). Also see m. Rebeiz, n.
H. Patel, and v. F. Hinman, “unravelling the
tangled skein: the evolution of transcriptional
regulatory networks in development” (Annu.
Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 16: 103–131,
2015).
one of the leading textbooks on developmen-
tal biology is Developmental Biology (11th
edition) by Scott F. Gilbert and michael J. F.
Barresi (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, mA,
2016). in Ecological Developmental Biology
(Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, mA, 2009),
Gilbert and david Epel treat the evolution and
ecology of phenotypic plasticity and related
topics.
Rudolph A. Raff, one of the founders of modern
EdB, portrayed the field at an early stage in his
influential book The Shape of Life: Genes, De-
velopment, and the Evolution of Animal Form
(university of Chicago Press, 1996). Eric H.
davidson, a developmental biologist whose
insights helped shape the field, did much the
same in The Regulatory Genome: Gene Regu-
latory Networks in Development and Evolution
(Academic Press, london, 2006).
An introduction to the evolution of modularity is
G. P. Wagner, m. Pavlicev, and J. m. Cheverud,
“The road to modularity” (Nat. Rev. Genet. 8:
921–931, 2007).
PRoBlEmS And diSCuSSion ToPiCS
- Haeckel’s statement that “ontogeny recapitu-
lates phylogeny” differs from what we now call
von Baer’s law—the generalization that features
common to a higher taxon often appear earlier
in development than the specific characters of
lower-level taxa. Compare and contrast these
two ways of thinking about changes in develop-
ment over the course of animal evolution. Even
though we now know that Haeckel’s dictum sel-
dom holds, what can we learn about phylogeny
from development? - if two allometrically related traits show a strong
correlation both within and among species,
what kinds of experiments would you use to test
whether these correlations are due to natural
selection or to developmental genetic con-
straints? (Assume the organisms of interest are
easily amenable to laboratory study.) What can
we infer about the underlying genetic architec-
ture of traits whose allometric relationships do
not vary? What about those that do vary?
- How might differential expression of and regu-
lation by Hox genes contribute to mosaic evolu-
tion in which different segments of an animal
body plan evolve different morphologies? - if mutations such as those of the Ubx gene can
drastically change morphology in a single step,
why do most evolutionary biologists maintain
that modification of existing traits and the evo-
lution of novel characters have generally pro-
ceeded by successive small steps? - Can convergent (or parallel) evolution of similar
morphology in two different lineages involve
15_EVOL4E_CH15.indd 397 3/22/17 1:31 PM