Synthetic Biology Parts, Devices and Applications

(Nandana) #1

124 6 Constitutive and Regulated Promoters in Yeast


28 Guarente, L. and Hoar, E. (1984) Upstream activation sites of the CYC1 gene of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae are active when inverted but not when placed
downstream of the ”TATA box”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 81 (24),
7860–7864.
29 Ogden, J.E., Stanway, C., Kim, S., Mellor, J., Kingsman, A.J., and Kingsman, S.M.
(1986) Efficient expression of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae PGK gene depends
on an upstream activation sequence but does not require TATA sequences.
Mol. Cell. Biol., 6 (12), 4335–4343.
30 Guarente, L., Lalonde, B., Gifford, P., and Alani, E. (1984) Distinctly regulated
tandem upstream activation sites mediate catabolite repression of the CYC1
gene of S. cerevisiae. Cell, 36 (2), 503–511.
31 Giniger, E., Varnum, S.M., and Ptashne, M. (1985) Specific DNA binding of
GAL4, a positive regulatory protein of yeast. Cell, 40 (4), 767–774.
32 Ptashne, M. and Gann, A. (1997) Transcriptional activation by recruitment.
Nature, 386 (6625), 569–577.
33 Keegan, L., Gill, G., and Ptashne, M. (1986) Separation of DNA binding from the
transcription‐activating function of a eukaryotic regulatory protein. Science,
231 (4739), 699–704.
34 Brent, R. and Ptashne, M. (1985) A eukaryotic transcriptional activator bearing
the DNA specificity of a prokaryotic repressor. Cell, 43 (3 Pt 2), 729–736.
35 Ma, J. and Ptashne, M. (1987) Deletion analysis of GAL4 defines two
transcriptional activating segments. Cell, 48 (5), 847–853.
36 Hope, I.A. and Struhl, K. (1986) Functional dissection of a eukaryotic
transcriptional activator protein, GCN4 of yeast. Cell, 46 (6), 885–894.
37 Wong, K.H. and Struhl, K. (2011) The Cyc8‐Tup1 complex inhibits
transcription primarily by masking the activation domain of the recruiting
protein. Genes Dev., 25 (23), 2525–2539.
38 Campos, E.I. and Reinberg, D. (2009) Histones: annotating chromatin.
Annu. Rev. Genet., 43 (1), 559–599.
39 Struhl, K. (1999) Fundamentally different logic of gene regulation in eukaryotes
and prokaryotes. Cell, 98 (1), 1–4.
40 Kornberg, R. (1981) The location of nucleosomes in chromatin: specific or
statistical? Nature, 292 (5824), 579–580.
41 Wang, X., Bai, L., Bryant, G.O., and Ptashne, M. (2011) Nucleosomes and the
accessibility problem. Trends Genet., 27 (12), 487–492.
42 Floer, M., Wang, X., Prabhu, V., Berrozpe, G., Narayan, S., Spagna, D., Alvarez,
D., Kendall, J., Krasnitz, A., Stepansky, A., Hicks, J., Bryant, G.O., and Ptashne,
M. (2010) A RSC/nucleosome complex determines chromatin architecture and
facilitates activator binding. Cell, 141 (3), 407–418.
43 Wang, X., Bryant, G.O., Floer, M., Spagna, D., and Ptashne, M. (2011) An effect
of DNA sequence on nucleosome occupancy and removal. Nat. Struct. Mol.
Biol., 18 (4), 507–509.
44 Iyer, V. and Struhl, K. (1995) Poly(dA: dT), a ubiquitous promoter element that
stimulates transcription via its intrinsic DNA structure. EMBO J., 14 (11),
2570–2579.
45 Raveh‐Sadka, T., Levo, M., Shabi, U., Shany, B., Keren, L., Lotan‐Pompan, M.,
Zeevi, D., Sharon, E., Weinberger, A., and Segal, E. (2012) Manipulating
Free download pdf