402 18 Synthetic Biology: From Genetic Engineering 2.0 to Responsible Research and Innovation
78 Bennett, G., Gilman, N., Stavrianakis, A., and Rabinow, P. (2009) From synthetic
biology to biohacking: are we prepared? Nat. Biotechnol., 27 (12), 1109–1111.
79 Delgado, A. (2013) DIYbio: making things and making futures. Futures, 48 ,
65–73.
80 DIYBio. (2013) An Institution for the Do-It-Yourself Biologist, http://diybio.org
81 Penders, B. (2011) DIY biology. Nature, 472 , 167.
82 Tocchetti, S. (2012) DIYbiologists as ‘makers’ of personal biologies: how MAKE
magazine and maker faires contribute in constituting biology as a personal
technology. J. Peer Prod., (2), 1–8.
83 Guan, Z., Schmidt, M., Pei, L., Wei, W., and Ma, K. (2013) Biosafety
considerations of synthetic biology in the international genetically engineered
machine (iGEM) competition. Bioscience, 63 (1), 25–34.
84 Jefferson, C. (2013) Governing Amateur Biology: Extending Responsible
Research and Innovation in Synthetic Biology to New Actors. Building a
Sustainable Capacity in Dual-Use Bioethics, Wellcome Trust Project.
85 NSABB (2011) Strategies to Educate Amateur Biologists and Scientists in
Non-life Science Disciplines About Dual Use Research in the Life Sciences,
NSABB, Washington, DC.
86 Pei, L., Bar-Yam, S., Byers-Corbin, J., Casagrande, R., Eichler, F., Lin, A.,
Österreicher, M., Regardh, P.C., Turlington, R.D., Oye, K.A., Torgersen, H.,
Schmidt, M., Guan, Z.-J., and Wei, W. (2012a) Regulatory frameworks for
synthetic biology, in Synthetic Biology Industrial and Environmental
Applications (ed. M. Schmidt), Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA,
Weinheim, p. 240.
87 Seyfried, G., Pei, L., and Schmidt, M. (2014) European do-it-yourself (DIY)
biology: beyond the hope, hype and horror. BioEssays, 36 (6), 548–551.
88 Wohlsen, M. (2008) Do it Yourself DNA: Amateurs Trying Genetic Engineering at
Home, The Huffington Post, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/12/25/
do-it-yourself-dna-amateu_n_153489.html
89 Saukshmya, T. and Chugh, A. (2010) Intellectual property rights in synthetic
biology: an anti-thesis to open access to research? Syst. Synth. Biol., 4 (4), 241–245.
90 Rai, A. and Boyle, J. (2007) Synthetic biology: caught between property rights,
the public domain, and the commons. PLoS Biol., 5 (3), e58.
91 BBF BioBricks Foundation, (2013) http://biobricks.org/about-foundation/
92 Ham, T.S., Dmytriv, Z., Plahar, H., Chen, J., Hillson, N.J., and Keasling, J.D.
(2012) Design, implementation and practice of JBEI-ICE: an open source
biological part registry platform and tools. Nucleic Acids Res., 40 (18), e141.
93 European Commission (2007) Synthetic Biology: a NEST Pathfinder Initiative,
ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/nest/docs/5-nest-synthetic-080507.pdf (accessed
30 September 2017).
94 Synbiosafe Safety and Ethical Aspects of Synthetic Biology, http://www.
synbiosafe.eu (accessed 30 September 2017).
95 Gutmann, A. (2011) The ethics of synthetic biology: guiding principles for
emerging technologies. Hastings Cent. Rep., 41 (4), 17–22.
96 Flipse, S.M., van der Sanden, M.C., and Osseweijer, P. (2013) Setting up spaces
for collaboration in industry between researchers from the natural and social
sciences. Sci. Eng. Ethics, 20 , 7–22.